Clinical Rehabilitation

Quartiles

The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.

Category	Year	Quartile
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	1999	Q2
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2000	Q1
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2001	Q1
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2002	Q1
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2003	Q1
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2004	Q1
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2005	Q1
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2006	Q1
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2007	Q1
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2008	Q1
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2009	Q1
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2010	Q1
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2011	Q1
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2012	Q1
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2013	Q1
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2014	Q1
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2015	Q1
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2016	Q1
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2017	Q1
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2018	Q1
Rehabilitation	1999	Q1
Rehabilitation	2000	Q1
Rehabilitation	2001	Q1
Rehabilitation	2002	Q1
Rehabilitation	2003	Q1
Rehabilitation	2004	Q1
Rehabilitation	2005	Q1
Rehabilitation	2006	Q1
Rehabilitation	2007	Q1
Rehabilitation	2008	Q1
Rehabilitation	2009	Q1
Rehabilitation	2010	Q1
Rehabilitation	2011	Q1
Rehabilitation	2012	Q1
Rehabilitation	2013	Q1
Rehabilitation	2014	Q1
Rehabilitation	2015	Q1
Rehabilitation	2016	Q1
Rehabilitation	2017	Q1
Rehabilitation	2018	Q1

SJR

The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.

Year	SJR
1999	0.410
2000	0.609
2001	0.534
2002	0.717
2003	0.699
2004	0.803
2005	0.880
2006	0.992
2007	0.951
2008	1.003
2009	1.021
2010	1.044
2011	1.108
2012	1.234
2013	1.038
2014	1.209
2015	1.255
2016	1.282
2017	1.322
2018	1.208

Citations per document

This indicator counts the number of citations received by documents from a journal and divides them by the total number of documents published in that journal. The chart shows the evolution of the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year. The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.

Cites per document	Year	Value
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	1999	0.735
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2000	1.104
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2001	1.546
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2002	1.589
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2003	1.941
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2004	1.957
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2005	2.271
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2006	2.371
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2007	2.719
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2008	2.791
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2009	2.745
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2010	3.097
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2011	3.234
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2012	3.103
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2013	3.462
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2014	3.326
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2015	3.272
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2016	3.248
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2017	3.430
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2018	3.305
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	1999	0.735
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2000	1.187
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2001	1.391
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2002	1.600
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2003	1.856
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2004	1.908
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2005	2.151
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2006	2.386
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2007	2.587
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2008	2.449
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2009	2.420
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2010	2.822
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2011	3.032
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2012	3.111
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2013	3.003
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2014	3.304
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2015	3.131
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2016	3.105
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2017	3.322
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2018	3.019
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	1999	0.799
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2000	0.962
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2001	1.333
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2002	1.200
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2003	1.528
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2004	1.523
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2005	1.945
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2006	2.083
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2007	1.919
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2008	2.167
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2009	1.966
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2010	2.445
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2011	2.849
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2012	2.567
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2013	2.824
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2014	3.098
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2015	2.816
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2016	2.918
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2017	3.067
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2018	2.709

Total Cites

Self-Cites

Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's self-citations received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years.
Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal.

Cites	Year	Value
Self Cites	1999	34
Self Cites	2000	28
Self Cites	2001	24
Self Cites	2002	52
Self Cites	2003	41
Self Cites	2004	70
Self Cites	2005	57
Self Cites	2006	58
Self Cites	2007	52
Self Cites	2008	38
Self Cites	2009	52
Self Cites	2010	32
Self Cites	2011	49
Self Cites	2012	52
Self Cites	2013	45
Self Cites	2014	50
Self Cites	2015	43
Self Cites	2016	63
Self Cites	2017	72
Self Cites	2018	60
Total Cites	1999	150
Total Cites	2000	254
Total Cites	2001	331
Total Cites	2002	344
Total Cites	2003	477
Total Cites	2004	559
Total Cites	2005	697
Total Cites	2006	761
Total Cites	2007	807
Total Cites	2008	747
Total Cites	2009	760
Total Cites	2010	858
Total Cites	2011	958
Total Cites	2012	952
Total Cites	2013	934
Total Cites	2014	1044
Total Cites	2015	1055
Total Cites	2016	1031
Total Cites	2017	1103
Total Cites	2018	1135

External Cites per Doc

Cites per Doc

Evolution of the number of total citation per document and external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. External citations are calculated by subtracting the number of self-citations from the total number of citations received by the journal’s documents.

Cites	Year	Value
External Cites per document	1999	0.569
External Cites per document	2000	1.056
External Cites per document	2001	1.290
External Cites per document	2002	1.358
External Cites per document	2003	1.696
External Cites per document	2004	1.669
External Cites per document	2005	1.975
External Cites per document	2006	2.204
External Cites per document	2007	2.420
External Cites per document	2008	2.325
External Cites per document	2009	2.255
External Cites per document	2010	2.717
External Cites per document	2011	2.877
External Cites per document	2012	2.941
External Cites per document	2013	2.859
External Cites per document	2014	3.146
External Cites per document	2015	3.003
External Cites per document	2016	2.916
External Cites per document	2017	3.105
External Cites per document	2018	2.859
Cites per document	1999	0.735
Cites per document	2000	1.187
Cites per document	2001	1.391
Cites per document	2002	1.600
Cites per document	2003	1.856
Cites per document	2004	1.908
Cites per document	2005	2.151
Cites per document	2006	2.386
Cites per document	2007	2.587
Cites per document	2008	2.449
Cites per document	2009	2.420
Cites per document	2010	2.822
Cites per document	2011	3.032
Cites per document	2012	3.111
Cites per document	2013	3.003
Cites per document	2014	3.304
Cites per document	2015	3.131
Cites per document	2016	3.105
Cites per document	2017	3.322
Cites per document	2018	3.019

% International Collaboration

International Collaboration accounts for the articles that have been produced by researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's documents signed by researchers from more than one country; that is including more than one country address.

Year	International Collaboration
1999	4.17
2000	11.76
2001	13.75
2002	6.90
2003	11.57
2004	8.65
2005	7.41
2006	10.00
2007	16.83
2008	12.71
2009	14.41
2010	13.93
2011	21.50
2012	13.71
2013	21.17
2014	17.14
2015	20.00
2016	16.00
2017	24.56
2018	18.29

Citable documents

Non-citable documents

Not every article in a journal is considered primary research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three year windows vs. those documents other than research articles, reviews and conference papers.

Documents	Year	Value
Non-citable documents	1999	18
Non-citable documents	2000	20
Non-citable documents	2001	21
Non-citable documents	2002	22
Non-citable documents	2003	24
Non-citable documents	2004	24
Non-citable documents	2005	17
Non-citable documents	2006	14
Non-citable documents	2007	20
Non-citable documents	2008	24
Non-citable documents	2009	25
Non-citable documents	2010	26
Non-citable documents	2011	35
Non-citable documents	2012	34
Non-citable documents	2013	42
Non-citable documents	2014	52
Non-citable documents	2015	64
Non-citable documents	2016	60
Non-citable documents	2017	48
Non-citable documents	2018	35
Citable documents	1999	204
Citable documents	2000	214
Citable documents	2001	238
Citable documents	2002	215
Citable documents	2003	257
Citable documents	2004	293
Citable documents	2005	324
Citable documents	2006	319
Citable documents	2007	312
Citable documents	2008	305
Citable documents	2009	314
Citable documents	2010	304
Citable documents	2011	316
Citable documents	2012	306
Citable documents	2013	311
Citable documents	2014	316
Citable documents	2015	337
Citable documents	2016	332
Citable documents	2017	332
Citable documents	2018	376

Cited documents

Uncited documents

Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those not cited during the following year.

Documents	Year	Value
Uncited documents	1999	146
Uncited documents	2000	123
Uncited documents	2001	137
Uncited documents	2002	98
Uncited documents	2003	110
Uncited documents	2004	103
Uncited documents	2005	102
Uncited documents	2006	93
Uncited documents	2007	94
Uncited documents	2008	103
Uncited documents	2009	102
Uncited documents	2010	89
Uncited documents	2011	91
Uncited documents	2012	98
Uncited documents	2013	102
Uncited documents	2014	109
Uncited documents	2015	119
Uncited documents	2016	118
Uncited documents	2017	92
Uncited documents	2018	99
Cited documents	1999	76
Cited documents	2000	111
Cited documents	2001	122
Cited documents	2002	139
Cited documents	2003	171
Cited documents	2004	214
Cited documents	2005	239
Cited documents	2006	240
Cited documents	2007	238
Cited documents	2008	226
Cited documents	2009	237
Cited documents	2010	241
Cited documents	2011	260
Cited documents	2012	242
Cited documents	2013	251
Cited documents	2014	259
Cited documents	2015	282
Cited documents	2016	274
Cited documents	2017	288
Cited documents	2018	312

Show this widget in your own website

Just copy the code below and paste within your html code:

Country	United States - SIR Ranking of United States	97 H Index
Subject Area and Category	Health Professions Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation Medicine Rehabilitation
Publisher	SAGE Publications
Publication type	Journals
ISSN	14770873, 02692155
Coverage	1987-ongoing
Scope	Clinical Rehabilitation is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal. It is a multi-professional journal covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, publishing research and discussion articles which are scientifically sound, clinically relevant and sometimes provocative. The journal acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. The leading journal in its field, Clinical Rehabilitation combines clinical application of scientific results and theoretical aspects in an ideal form. It gives high priority to articles describing effectiveness of therapeutic interventions and the evaluation of new techniques and methods.
	Homepage
	Join the conversation about this journal

Clinical Rehabilitation

Leave a comment