Human Resources for Health

Quartiles

The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.

Category	Year	Quartile
Public Administration	2004	Q1
Public Administration	2005	Q1
Public Administration	2006	Q1
Public Administration	2007	Q1
Public Administration	2008	Q1
Public Administration	2009	Q1
Public Administration	2010	Q1
Public Administration	2011	Q1
Public Administration	2012	Q1
Public Administration	2013	Q1
Public Administration	2014	Q1
Public Administration	2015	Q1
Public Administration	2016	Q1
Public Administration	2017	Q1
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health	2004	Q1
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health	2005	Q1
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health	2006	Q1
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health	2007	Q1
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health	2008	Q1
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health	2009	Q1
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health	2010	Q1
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health	2011	Q1
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health	2012	Q1
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health	2013	Q1
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health	2014	Q1
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health	2015	Q1
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health	2016	Q1
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health	2017	Q1

SJR

The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.

Year	SJR
2004	1.453
2005	1.173
2006	1.960
2007	1.669
2008	0.953
2009	1.250
2010	1.474
2011	1.395
2012	1.426
2013	1.448
2014	1.001
2015	1.253
2016	1.094
2017	1.301

Citations per document

This indicator counts the number of citations received by documents from a journal and divides them by the total number of documents published in that journal. The chart shows the evolution of the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year. The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.

Cites per document	Year	Value
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2003	0.000
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2004	2.333
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2005	2.138
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2006	2.769
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2007	3.046
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2008	2.462
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2009	2.511
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2010	2.350
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2011	2.561
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2012	2.917
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2013	3.303
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2014	2.959
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2015	3.176
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2016	2.393
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2017	2.761
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2003	0.000
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2004	2.333
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2005	2.138
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2006	2.769
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2007	2.887
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2008	2.016
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2009	2.600
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2010	2.075
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2011	2.547
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2012	3.007
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2013	2.895
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2014	2.643
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2015	3.005
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2016	2.305
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2017	2.455
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2003	0.000
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2004	2.333
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2005	2.138
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2006	2.778
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2007	1.750
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2008	1.941
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2009	1.963
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2010	1.982
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2011	2.636
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2012	2.525
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2013	2.333
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2014	2.387
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2015	2.979
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2016	1.913
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2017	2.227

Total Cites

Self-Cites

Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's self-citations received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years.
Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal.

Cites	Year	Value
Self Cites	2003	0
Self Cites	2004	11
Self Cites	2005	11
Self Cites	2006	24
Self Cites	2007	29
Self Cites	2008	19
Self Cites	2009	65
Self Cites	2010	27
Self Cites	2011	31
Self Cites	2012	41
Self Cites	2013	32
Self Cites	2014	78
Self Cites	2015	107
Self Cites	2016	100
Self Cites	2017	107
Total Cites	2003	0
Total Cites	2004	28
Total Cites	2005	62
Total Cites	2006	108
Total Cites	2007	153
Total Cites	2008	123
Total Cites	2009	208
Total Cites	2010	278
Total Cites	2011	354
Total Cites	2012	418
Total Cites	2013	304
Total Cites	2014	370
Total Cites	2015	577
Total Cites	2016	574
Total Cites	2017	631

External Cites per Doc

Cites per Doc

Evolution of the number of total citation per document and external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. External citations are calculated by subtracting the number of self-citations from the total number of citations received by the journal’s documents.

Cites	Year	Value
External Cites per document	2003	0
External Cites per document	2004	1.417
External Cites per document	2005	1.759
External Cites per document	2006	2.154
External Cites per document	2007	2.340
External Cites per document	2008	1.705
External Cites per document	2009	1.788
External Cites per document	2010	1.873
External Cites per document	2011	2.324
External Cites per document	2012	2.712
External Cites per document	2013	2.590
External Cites per document	2014	2.086
External Cites per document	2015	2.448
External Cites per document	2016	1.904
External Cites per document	2017	2.039
Cites per document	2003	0.000
Cites per document	2004	2.333
Cites per document	2005	2.138
Cites per document	2006	2.769
Cites per document	2007	2.887
Cites per document	2008	2.016
Cites per document	2009	2.600
Cites per document	2010	2.075
Cites per document	2011	2.547
Cites per document	2012	3.007
Cites per document	2013	2.895
Cites per document	2014	2.643
Cites per document	2015	3.005
Cites per document	2016	2.305
Cites per document	2017	2.455

% International Collaboration

International Collaboration accounts for the articles that have been produced by researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's documents signed by researchers from more than one country; that is including more than one country address.

Year	International Collaboration
2003	41.67
2004	35.29
2005	18.18
2006	48.15
2007	46.15
2008	44.83
2009	51.19
2010	60.00
2011	70.00
2012	56.25
2013	44.12
2014	59.52
2015	50.86
2016	51.32
2017	56.82

Citable documents

Non-citable documents

Not every article in a journal is considered primary research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three year windows vs. those documents other than research articles, reviews and conference papers.

Documents	Year	Value
Non-citable documents	2003	0
Non-citable documents	2004	0
Non-citable documents	2005	0
Non-citable documents	2006	1
Non-citable documents	2007	2
Non-citable documents	2008	3
Non-citable documents	2009	2
Non-citable documents	2010	5
Non-citable documents	2011	4
Non-citable documents	2012	5
Non-citable documents	2013	3
Non-citable documents	2014	6
Non-citable documents	2015	8
Non-citable documents	2016	19
Non-citable documents	2017	19
Citable documents	2003	0
Citable documents	2004	12
Citable documents	2005	29
Citable documents	2006	39
Citable documents	2007	53
Citable documents	2008	61
Citable documents	2009	80
Citable documents	2010	134
Citable documents	2011	139
Citable documents	2012	139
Citable documents	2013	105
Citable documents	2014	140
Citable documents	2015	192
Citable documents	2016	249
Citable documents	2017	257

Cited documents

Uncited documents

Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those not cited during the following year.

Documents	Year	Value
Uncited documents	2003	0
Uncited documents	2004	2
Uncited documents	2005	8
Uncited documents	2006	9
Uncited documents	2007	15
Uncited documents	2008	18
Uncited documents	2009	22
Uncited documents	2010	43
Uncited documents	2011	26
Uncited documents	2012	28
Uncited documents	2013	32
Uncited documents	2014	29
Uncited documents	2015	39
Uncited documents	2016	64
Uncited documents	2017	65
Cited documents	2003	0
Cited documents	2004	10
Cited documents	2005	21
Cited documents	2006	31
Cited documents	2007	40
Cited documents	2008	46
Cited documents	2009	60
Cited documents	2010	96
Cited documents	2011	117
Cited documents	2012	116
Cited documents	2013	76
Cited documents	2014	117
Cited documents	2015	161
Cited documents	2016	204
Cited documents	2017	211

Show this widget in your own website

Just copy the code below and paste within your html code:

Country	United Kingdom	47 H Index
Subject Area and Category	Medicine Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health Social Sciences Public Administration
Publisher	BioMed Central
Publication type	Journals
ISSN	14784491
Coverage	2003-ongoing
Scope	Human Resources for Health is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal covering all aspects of planning, producing and managing the health workforce - all those who provide health services worldwide. Human Resources for Health aims to disseminate research on health workforce policy, the health labour market, health workforce practice, development of knowledge tools and implementation mechanisms nationally and internationally; as well as specific features of the health workforce, such as the impact of management of health workers" performance and its link with health outcomes. The journal encourages debate on health sector reforms and their link with human resources issues, a hitherto-neglected area. (source)