Journal of the Learning Sciences

Quartiles

The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.

Category	Year	Quartile
Developmental and Educational Psychology	1999	Q1
Developmental and Educational Psychology	2000	Q1
Developmental and Educational Psychology	2001	Q1
Developmental and Educational Psychology	2002	Q1
Developmental and Educational Psychology	2003	Q1
Developmental and Educational Psychology	2004	Q1
Developmental and Educational Psychology	2005	Q1
Developmental and Educational Psychology	2006	Q1
Developmental and Educational Psychology	2007	Q1
Developmental and Educational Psychology	2008	Q1
Developmental and Educational Psychology	2009	Q1
Developmental and Educational Psychology	2010	Q1
Developmental and Educational Psychology	2011	Q1
Developmental and Educational Psychology	2012	Q1
Developmental and Educational Psychology	2013	Q1
Developmental and Educational Psychology	2014	Q1
Developmental and Educational Psychology	2015	Q1
Developmental and Educational Psychology	2016	Q1
Developmental and Educational Psychology	2017	Q1
Developmental and Educational Psychology	2018	Q1
Education	1999	Q1
Education	2000	Q1
Education	2001	Q1
Education	2002	Q1
Education	2003	Q1
Education	2004	Q1
Education	2005	Q1
Education	2006	Q1
Education	2007	Q1
Education	2008	Q1
Education	2009	Q1
Education	2010	Q1
Education	2011	Q1
Education	2012	Q1
Education	2013	Q1
Education	2014	Q1
Education	2015	Q1
Education	2016	Q1
Education	2017	Q1
Education	2018	Q1

SJR

The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.

Year	SJR
1999	1.623
2000	1.427
2001	1.914
2002	1.527
2003	2.846
2004	2.161
2005	3.473
2006	2.893
2007	3.132
2008	4.592
2009	2.265
2010	1.943
2011	2.313
2012	2.611
2013	2.904
2014	3.131
2015	3.293
2016	2.174
2017	1.811
2018	2.752

Citations per document

This indicator counts the number of citations received by documents from a journal and divides them by the total number of documents published in that journal. The chart shows the evolution of the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year. The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.

Cites per document	Year	Value
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	1999	1.559
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2000	1.841
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2001	2.068
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2002	2.133
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2003	2.319
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2004	3.638
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2005	4.122
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2006	5.300
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2007	5.214
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2008	7.000
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2009	5.033
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2010	5.844
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2011	4.119
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2012	4.855
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2013	5.172
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2014	6.348
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2015	5.197
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2016	4.958
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2017	5.000
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2018	6.329
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	1999	1.559
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2000	1.844
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2001	1.970
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2002	1.882
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2003	2.270
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2004	3.057
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2005	4.514
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2006	6.189
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2007	4.783
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2008	5.326
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2009	4.521
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2010	4.333
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2011	3.756
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2012	4.191
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2013	5.313
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2014	5.288
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2015	5.241
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2016	4.000
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2017	4.774
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2018	5.784
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	1999	1.409
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2000	1.714
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2001	1.727
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2002	1.625
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2003	1.720
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2004	3.348
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2005	5.667
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2006	6.111
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2007	3.000
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2008	4.333
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2009	3.517
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2010	3.290
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2011	3.533
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2012	4.387
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2013	4.265
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2014	4.886
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2015	4.649
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2016	3.622
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2017	3.794
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2018	6.273

Total Cites

Self-Cites

Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's self-citations received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years.
Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal.

Cites	Year	Value
Self Cites	1999	7
Self Cites	2000	9
Self Cites	2001	13
Self Cites	2002	5
Self Cites	2003	11
Self Cites	2004	19
Self Cites	2005	9
Self Cites	2006	22
Self Cites	2007	15
Self Cites	2008	12
Self Cites	2009	6
Self Cites	2010	6
Self Cites	2011	17
Self Cites	2012	12
Self Cites	2013	14
Self Cites	2014	12
Self Cites	2015	17
Self Cites	2016	24
Self Cites	2017	33
Self Cites	2018	15
Total Cites	1999	53
Total Cites	2000	59
Total Cites	2001	65
Total Cites	2002	64
Total Cites	2003	84
Total Cites	2004	107
Total Cites	2005	167
Total Cites	2006	229
Total Cites	2007	220
Total Cites	2008	245
Total Cites	2009	217
Total Cites	2010	195
Total Cites	2011	169
Total Cites	2012	197
Total Cites	2013	255
Total Cites	2014	275
Total Cites	2015	283
Total Cites	2016	220
Total Cites	2017	253
Total Cites	2018	295

External Cites per Doc

Cites per Doc

Evolution of the number of total citation per document and external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. External citations are calculated by subtracting the number of self-citations from the total number of citations received by the journal’s documents.

Cites	Year	Value
External Cites per document	1999	1.353
External Cites per document	2000	1.563
External Cites per document	2001	1.576
External Cites per document	2002	1.735
External Cites per document	2003	1.973
External Cites per document	2004	2.514
External Cites per document	2005	4.270
External Cites per document	2006	5.595
External Cites per document	2007	4.457
External Cites per document	2008	5.065
External Cites per document	2009	4.396
External Cites per document	2010	4.200
External Cites per document	2011	3.378
External Cites per document	2012	3.936
External Cites per document	2013	5.021
External Cites per document	2014	5.058
External Cites per document	2015	4.926
External Cites per document	2016	3.564
External Cites per document	2017	4.151
External Cites per document	2018	5.490
Cites per document	1999	1.559
Cites per document	2000	1.844
Cites per document	2001	1.970
Cites per document	2002	1.882
Cites per document	2003	2.270
Cites per document	2004	3.057
Cites per document	2005	4.514
Cites per document	2006	6.189
Cites per document	2007	4.783
Cites per document	2008	5.326
Cites per document	2009	4.521
Cites per document	2010	4.333
Cites per document	2011	3.756
Cites per document	2012	4.191
Cites per document	2013	5.313
Cites per document	2014	5.288
Cites per document	2015	5.241
Cites per document	2016	4.000
Cites per document	2017	4.774
Cites per document	2018	5.784

% International Collaboration

International Collaboration accounts for the articles that have been produced by researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's documents signed by researchers from more than one country; that is including more than one country address.

Year	International Collaboration
1999	0.00
2000	0.00
2001	0.00
2002	5.00
2003	0.00
2004	0.00
2005	15.38
2006	20.00
2007	26.67
2008	80.00
2009	5.00
2010	23.53
2011	5.56
2012	10.53
2013	9.52
2014	4.17
2015	27.27
2016	22.73
2017	4.55
2018	19.05

Citable documents

Non-citable documents

Not every article in a journal is considered primary research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three year windows vs. those documents other than research articles, reviews and conference papers.

Documents	Year	Value
Non-citable documents	1999	0
Non-citable documents	2000	0
Non-citable documents	2001	0
Non-citable documents	2002	0
Non-citable documents	2003	7
Non-citable documents	2004	9
Non-citable documents	2005	12
Non-citable documents	2006	5
Non-citable documents	2007	4
Non-citable documents	2008	2
Non-citable documents	2009	2
Non-citable documents	2010	5
Non-citable documents	2011	7
Non-citable documents	2012	8
Non-citable documents	2013	6
Non-citable documents	2014	6
Non-citable documents	2015	10
Non-citable documents	2016	12
Non-citable documents	2017	15
Non-citable documents	2018	15
Citable documents	1999	34
Citable documents	2000	32
Citable documents	2001	33
Citable documents	2002	34
Citable documents	2003	37
Citable documents	2004	35
Citable documents	2005	37
Citable documents	2006	37
Citable documents	2007	46
Citable documents	2008	46
Citable documents	2009	48
Citable documents	2010	45
Citable documents	2011	45
Citable documents	2012	47
Citable documents	2013	48
Citable documents	2014	52
Citable documents	2015	54
Citable documents	2016	55
Citable documents	2017	53
Citable documents	2018	51

Cited documents

Uncited documents

Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those not cited during the following year.

Documents	Year	Value
Uncited documents	1999	10
Uncited documents	2000	11
Uncited documents	2001	10
Uncited documents	2002	11
Uncited documents	2003	15
Uncited documents	2004	16
Uncited documents	2005	13
Uncited documents	2006	6
Uncited documents	2007	14
Uncited documents	2008	10
Uncited documents	2009	3
Uncited documents	2010	9
Uncited documents	2011	13
Uncited documents	2012	13
Uncited documents	2013	7
Uncited documents	2014	8
Uncited documents	2015	10
Uncited documents	2016	17
Uncited documents	2017	14
Uncited documents	2018	9
Cited documents	1999	24
Cited documents	2000	21
Cited documents	2001	23
Cited documents	2002	23
Cited documents	2003	29
Cited documents	2004	28
Cited documents	2005	36
Cited documents	2006	36
Cited documents	2007	36
Cited documents	2008	38
Cited documents	2009	47
Cited documents	2010	41
Cited documents	2011	39
Cited documents	2012	42
Cited documents	2013	47
Cited documents	2014	50
Cited documents	2015	54
Cited documents	2016	50
Cited documents	2017	54
Cited documents	2018	57

Show this widget in your own website

Just copy the code below and paste within your html code:

Country	United States - SIR Ranking of United States	84 H Index
Subject Area and Category	Psychology Developmental and Educational Psychology Social Sciences Education
Publisher	Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Publication type	Journals
ISSN	10508406, 15327809
Coverage	1991-1992, 1994-ongoing
Scope	The Journal of the Learning Sciences provides a multidisciplinary forum for the presentation of research on learning and education. The journal seeks to foster new ways of thinking about learning that will allow our understanding of cognition and social cognition to have impact in education. It publishes research articles that advance our understanding of learning in real-world situations and of promoting learning in such venues, including articles that report on the roles of technology can play in promoting deep and lasting learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences promotes engaging and thoughtful participation in learning activities, and articles reporting on new methodologies that enable rigorous investigation of learning in real-world situations.
	Homepage
	Join the conversation about this journal

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Leave a comment