Transport Reviews

Quartiles

The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.

Category	Year	Quartile
Transportation	1997	Q1
Transportation	1998	Q2
Transportation	1999	Q1
Transportation	2000	Q1
Transportation	2001	Q2
Transportation	2002	Q2
Transportation	2003	Q2
Transportation	2004	Q2
Transportation	2005	Q1
Transportation	2006	Q2
Transportation	2007	Q1
Transportation	2008	Q2
Transportation	2009	Q2
Transportation	2010	Q1
Transportation	2011	Q1
Transportation	2012	Q1
Transportation	2013	Q1
Transportation	2014	Q1
Transportation	2015	Q1
Transportation	2016	Q1

SJR

The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.

Year	SJR
1999	0.438
2000	0.903
2001	0.377
2002	0.315
2003	0.614
2004	0.430
2005	0.715
2006	0.604
2007	1.339
2008	0.781
2009	0.867
2010	0.998
2011	1.421
2012	1.509
2013	1.630
2014	1.942
2015	1.750
2016	2.090

Citations per document

This indicator counts the number of citations received by documents from a journal and divides them by the total number of documents published in that journal. The chart shows the evolution of the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year. The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.

Cites per document	Year	Value
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	1999	0.368
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2000	0.641
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2001	0.386
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2002	0.570
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2003	0.400
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2004	0.539
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2005	0.827
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2006	1.072
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2007	1.565
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2008	1.681
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2009	1.727
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2010	2.493
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2011	2.593
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2012	3.292
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2013	3.028
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2014	4.069
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2015	3.938
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2016	4.401
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	1999	0.368
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2000	0.696
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2001	0.385
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2002	0.580
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2003	0.392
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2004	0.480
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2005	0.876
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2006	0.980
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2007	1.700
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2008	1.367
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2009	1.523
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2010	2.419
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2011	2.726
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2012	2.764
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2013	2.880
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2014	3.855
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2015	3.667
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2016	4.280
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	1999	0.514
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2000	0.737
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2001	0.292
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2002	0.542
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2003	0.426
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2004	0.426
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2005	0.857
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2006	1.070
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2007	1.333
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2008	1.192
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2009	1.412
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2010	2.493
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2011	2.347
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2012	2.384
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2013	2.521
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2014	3.778
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2015	3.712
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2016	3.129

Total Cites

Self-Cites

Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's self-citations received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years.
Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal.

Cites	Year	Value
Self Cites	1999	4
Self Cites	2000	7
Self Cites	2001	7
Self Cites	2002	14
Self Cites	2003	8
Self Cites	2004	4
Self Cites	2005	12
Self Cites	2006	18
Self Cites	2007	18
Self Cites	2008	10
Self Cites	2009	7
Self Cites	2010	27
Self Cites	2011	10
Self Cites	2012	27
Self Cites	2013	32
Self Cites	2014	25
Self Cites	2015	21
Self Cites	2016	40
Total Cites	1999	21
Total Cites	2000	39
Total Cites	2001	25
Total Cites	2002	40
Total Cites	2003	29
Total Cites	2004	36
Total Cites	2005	78
Total Cites	2006	97
Total Cites	2007	187
Total Cites	2008	149
Total Cites	2009	163
Total Cites	2010	254
Total Cites	2011	289
Total Cites	2012	304
Total Cites	2013	311
Total Cites	2014	424
Total Cites	2015	396
Total Cites	2016	458

External Cites per Doc

Cites per Doc

Evolution of the number of total citation per document and external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. External citations are calculated by subtracting the number of self-citations from the total number of citations received by the journal’s documents.

Cites	Year	Value
External Cites per document	1999	0.298
External Cites per document	2000	0.571
External Cites per document	2001	0.277
External Cites per document	2002	0.377
External Cites per document	2003	0.284
External Cites per document	2004	0.427
External Cites per document	2005	0.742
External Cites per document	2006	0.798
External Cites per document	2007	1.536
External Cites per document	2008	1.275
External Cites per document	2009	1.458
External Cites per document	2010	2.162
External Cites per document	2011	2.632
External Cites per document	2012	2.518
External Cites per document	2013	2.583
External Cites per document	2014	3.627
External Cites per document	2015	3.472
External Cites per document	2016	3.907
Cites per document	1999	0.368
Cites per document	2000	0.696
Cites per document	2001	0.385
Cites per document	2002	0.580
Cites per document	2003	0.392
Cites per document	2004	0.480
Cites per document	2005	0.876
Cites per document	2006	0.980
Cites per document	2007	1.700
Cites per document	2008	1.367
Cites per document	2009	1.523
Cites per document	2010	2.419
Cites per document	2011	2.726
Cites per document	2012	2.764
Cites per document	2013	2.880
Cites per document	2014	3.855
Cites per document	2015	3.667
Cites per document	2016	4.280

% International Collaboration

International Collaboration accounts for the articles that have been produced by researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's documents signed by researchers from more than one country; that is including more than one country address.

Year	International Collaboration
1999	14.29
2000	10.71
2001	4.76
2002	3.85
2003	10.71
2004	27.78
2005	24.32
2006	26.83
2007	29.41
2008	13.95
2009	31.58
2010	14.29
2011	20.51
2012	20.51
2013	28.21
2014	18.18
2015	35.00
2016	22.73

Citable documents

Non-citable documents

Not every article in a journal is considered primary research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three year windows vs. those documents other than research articles, reviews and conference papers.

Documents	Year	Value
Non-citable documents	1999	1
Non-citable documents	2000	1
Non-citable documents	2001	2
Non-citable documents	2002	1
Non-citable documents	2003	1
Non-citable documents	2004	0
Non-citable documents	2005	1
Non-citable documents	2006	2
Non-citable documents	2007	4
Non-citable documents	2008	3
Non-citable documents	2009	11
Non-citable documents	2010	10
Non-citable documents	2011	10
Non-citable documents	2012	2
Non-citable documents	2013	5
Non-citable documents	2014	7
Non-citable documents	2015	14
Non-citable documents	2016	16
Citable documents	1999	57
Citable documents	2000	56
Citable documents	2001	65
Citable documents	2002	69
Citable documents	2003	74
Citable documents	2004	75
Citable documents	2005	89
Citable documents	2006	99
Citable documents	2007	110
Citable documents	2008	109
Citable documents	2009	107
Citable documents	2010	105
Citable documents	2011	106
Citable documents	2012	110
Citable documents	2013	108
Citable documents	2014	110
Citable documents	2015	108
Citable documents	2016	107

Cited documents

Uncited documents

Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those not cited during the following year.

Documents	Year	Value
Uncited documents	1999	42
Uncited documents	2000	31
Uncited documents	2001	50
Uncited documents	2002	40
Uncited documents	2003	54
Uncited documents	2004	51
Uncited documents	2005	51
Uncited documents	2006	59
Uncited documents	2007	51
Uncited documents	2008	48
Uncited documents	2009	53
Uncited documents	2010	35
Uncited documents	2011	36
Uncited documents	2012	27
Uncited documents	2013	27
Uncited documents	2014	23
Uncited documents	2015	30
Uncited documents	2016	28
Cited documents	1999	16
Cited documents	2000	26
Cited documents	2001	17
Cited documents	2002	30
Cited documents	2003	21
Cited documents	2004	24
Cited documents	2005	39
Cited documents	2006	42
Cited documents	2007	63
Cited documents	2008	64
Cited documents	2009	65
Cited documents	2010	80
Cited documents	2011	80
Cited documents	2012	85
Cited documents	2013	86
Cited documents	2014	94
Cited documents	2015	92
Cited documents	2016	95

Show this widget in your own website

Just copy the code below and paste within your html code:

Country	United Kingdom	55 H Index
Subject Area and Category	Social Sciences Transportation
Publisher	Taylor & Francis
Publication type	Journals
ISSN	14645327, 01441647
Coverage	1984-ongoing
Scope	Transport Reviews is an international review journal covering all aspects of transport. It is intended to provide authoritative and up to date research-based reviews of transport related topics that are informative to those that are knowledgeable in the subject area. It also provides a means by which experts from different backgrounds can find out about the subject area, so the papers should be accessible to a wide ranging readership. (source)