Academy of Management Learning and Education

Quartiles

The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.

Category	Year	Quartile
Education	2006	Q2
Education	2007	Q1
Education	2008	Q1
Education	2009	Q1
Education	2010	Q1
Education	2011	Q1
Education	2012	Q1
Education	2013	Q1
Education	2014	Q1
Education	2015	Q1
Education	2016	Q1
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management	2006	Q2
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management	2007	Q1
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management	2008	Q1
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management	2009	Q1
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management	2010	Q1
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management	2011	Q1
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management	2012	Q1
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management	2013	Q1
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management	2014	Q1
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management	2015	Q1
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management	2016	Q1

SJR

The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.

Year	SJR
2006	0.445
2007	1.929
2008	1.664
2009	1.536
2010	1.290
2011	2.135
2012	2.267
2013	2.044
2014	1.582
2015	1.580
2016	1.857

Citations per document

This indicator counts the number of citations received by documents from a journal and divides them by the total number of documents published in that journal. The chart shows the evolution of the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year. The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.

Cites per document	Year	Value
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2006	1.651
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2007	3.372
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2008	3.530
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2009	3.884
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2010	3.936
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2011	3.994
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2012	4.065
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2013	4.006
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2014	3.444
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2015	4.344
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2016	4.146
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2006	1.651
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2007	3.372
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2008	3.530
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2009	2.893
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2010	3.628
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2011	4.015
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2012	3.984
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2013	3.473
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2014	3.050
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2015	3.684
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2016	4.041
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2006	1.651
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2007	3.372
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2008	2.625
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2009	2.623
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2010	3.298
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2011	3.598
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2012	3.294
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2013	2.928
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2014	2.393
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2015	3.279
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2016	2.833

Total Cites

Self-Cites

Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's self-citations received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years.
Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal.

Cites	Year	Value
Self Cites	2006	20
Self Cites	2007	32
Self Cites	2008	27
Self Cites	2009	76
Self Cites	2010	82
Self Cites	2011	131
Self Cites	2012	90
Self Cites	2013	65
Self Cites	2014	39
Self Cites	2015	47
Self Cites	2016	60
Total Cites	2006	71
Total Cites	2007	263
Total Cites	2008	406
Total Cites	2009	324
Total Cites	2010	439
Total Cites	2011	530
Total Cites	2012	514
Total Cites	2013	455
Total Cites	2014	369
Total Cites	2015	420
Total Cites	2016	396

External Cites per Doc

Cites per Doc

Evolution of the number of total citation per document and external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. External citations are calculated by subtracting the number of self-citations from the total number of citations received by the journal’s documents.

Cites	Year	Value
External Cites per document	2006	1.186
External Cites per document	2007	2.962
External Cites per document	2008	3.296
External Cites per document	2009	2.214
External Cites per document	2010	2.950
External Cites per document	2011	3.023
External Cites per document	2012	3.287
External Cites per document	2013	2.977
External Cites per document	2014	2.727
External Cites per document	2015	3.272
External Cites per document	2016	3.429
Cites per document	2006	1.651
Cites per document	2007	3.372
Cites per document	2008	3.530
Cites per document	2009	2.893
Cites per document	2010	3.628
Cites per document	2011	4.015
Cites per document	2012	3.984
Cites per document	2013	3.473
Cites per document	2014	3.050
Cites per document	2015	3.684
Cites per document	2016	4.041

% International Collaboration

International Collaboration accounts for the articles that have been produced by researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's documents signed by researchers from more than one country; that is including more than one country address.

Year	International Collaboration
2006	8.16
2007	11.11
2008	13.73
2009	25.00
2010	19.30
2011	30.00
2012	12.28
2013	32.65
2014	21.43
2015	29.03
2016	39.02

Citable documents

Non-citable documents

Not every article in a journal is considered primary research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three year windows vs. those documents other than research articles, reviews and conference papers.

Documents	Year	Value
Non-citable documents	2006	12
Non-citable documents	2007	26
Non-citable documents	2008	34
Non-citable documents	2009	33
Non-citable documents	2010	27
Non-citable documents	2011	28
Non-citable documents	2012	30
Non-citable documents	2013	33
Non-citable documents	2014	35
Non-citable documents	2015	34
Non-citable documents	2016	24
Citable documents	2006	43
Citable documents	2007	78
Citable documents	2008	115
Citable documents	2009	112
Citable documents	2010	121
Citable documents	2011	132
Citable documents	2012	129
Citable documents	2013	131
Citable documents	2014	121
Citable documents	2015	114
Citable documents	2016	98

Cited documents

Uncited documents

Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those not cited during the following year.

Documents	Year	Value
Uncited documents	2006	34
Uncited documents	2007	47
Uncited documents	2008	60
Uncited documents	2009	48
Uncited documents	2010	44
Uncited documents	2011	41
Uncited documents	2012	51
Uncited documents	2013	48
Uncited documents	2014	46
Uncited documents	2015	40
Uncited documents	2016	33
Cited documents	2006	21
Cited documents	2007	57
Cited documents	2008	89
Cited documents	2009	97
Cited documents	2010	104
Cited documents	2011	119
Cited documents	2012	108
Cited documents	2013	116
Cited documents	2014	110
Cited documents	2015	108
Cited documents	2016	89

Show this widget in your own website

Just copy the code below and paste within your html code:

Country	United States	51 H Index
Subject Area and Category	Business, Management and Accounting Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management Social Sciences Education
Publisher	Academy of Management
Publication type	Journals
ISSN	1537260X
Coverage	2005-ongoing
Scope	The Academy of Management Learning & Education (AMLE) advances the knowledge and practice of management learning and education. It does so by publishing theoretical models and reviews, qualitative and quantitative research, critique, exchanges, and retrospectives on any substantive topic that is conceived with, and draws implications for, how managers learn and the educational process and context. AMLE is an interdisciplinary journal that broadly defines its constituents to include scholars, educators, program directors, deans, and other administrators at academic institutions, as well as consultants, policy makers and practitioners in private or public organizations in which management learning and education are of central concern. (source)