Journal of Retailing

Quartiles

The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.

Category	Year	Quartile
Marketing	1997	Q2
Marketing	1998	Q1
Marketing	1999	Q1
Marketing	2000	Q1
Marketing	2001	Q1
Marketing	2002	Q1
Marketing	2003	Q1
Marketing	2004	Q1
Marketing	2005	Q1
Marketing	2006	Q1
Marketing	2007	Q1
Marketing	2008	Q1
Marketing	2009	Q1
Marketing	2010	Q1
Marketing	2011	Q1
Marketing	2012	Q1
Marketing	2013	Q1
Marketing	2014	Q1
Marketing	2015	Q1
Marketing	2016	Q1

SJR

The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.

Year	SJR
1999	1.118
2000	1.469
2001	1.060
2002	1.397
2003	1.931
2004	1.435
2005	1.412
2006	2.168
2007	2.277
2008	2.428
2009	2.528
2010	2.580
2011	2.477
2012	2.332
2013	1.694
2014	2.528
2015	2.150
2016	2.556

Citations per document

This indicator counts the number of citations received by documents from a journal and divides them by the total number of documents published in that journal. The chart shows the evolution of the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year. The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.

Cites per document	Year	Value
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	1999	1.364
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2000	1.978
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2001	1.859
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2002	1.915
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2003	2.600
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2004	3.914
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2005	3.484
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2006	3.579
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2007	4.433
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2008	5.932
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2009	5.975
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2010	4.296
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2011	5.650
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2012	4.427
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2013	4.148
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2014	4.118
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2015	4.437
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2016	4.940
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	1999	1.364
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2000	1.794
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2001	1.246
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2002	1.833
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2003	2.583
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2004	2.957
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2005	2.657
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2006	2.972
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2007	3.783
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2008	4.846
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2009	5.926
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2010	4.019
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2011	4.612
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2012	3.746
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2013	2.785
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2014	4.084
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2015	3.432
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2016	4.775
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	1999	1.133
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2000	0.800
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2001	0.979
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2002	1.837
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2003	1.688
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2004	2.205
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2005	2.000
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2006	2.118
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2007	2.421
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2008	4.652
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2009	5.645
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2010	3.043
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2011	4.000
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2012	2.037
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2013	2.494
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2014	3.028
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2015	2.789
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2016	4.418

Total Cites

Self-Cites

Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's self-citations received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years.
Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal.

Cites	Year	Value
Self Cites	1999	21
Self Cites	2000	19
Self Cites	2001	12
Self Cites	2002	10
Self Cites	2003	14
Self Cites	2004	33
Self Cites	2005	13
Self Cites	2006	30
Self Cites	2007	133
Self Cites	2008	234
Self Cites	2009	255
Self Cites	2010	64
Self Cites	2011	115
Self Cites	2012	84
Self Cites	2013	22
Self Cites	2014	33
Self Cites	2015	26
Self Cites	2016	26
Total Cites	1999	90
Total Cites	2000	122
Total Cites	2001	86
Total Cites	2002	132
Total Cites	2003	186
Total Cites	2004	204
Total Cites	2005	186
Total Cites	2006	214
Total Cites	2007	314
Total Cites	2008	441
Total Cites	2009	557
Total Cites	2010	414
Total Cites	2011	475
Total Cites	2012	457
Total Cites	2013	337
Total Cites	2014	486
Total Cites	2015	381
Total Cites	2016	530

External Cites per Doc

Cites per Doc

Evolution of the number of total citation per document and external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. External citations are calculated by subtracting the number of self-citations from the total number of citations received by the journal’s documents.

Cites	Year	Value
External Cites per document	1999	1.045
External Cites per document	2000	1.515
External Cites per document	2001	1.072
External Cites per document	2002	1.694
External Cites per document	2003	2.389
External Cites per document	2004	2.478
External Cites per document	2005	2.471
External Cites per document	2006	2.556
External Cites per document	2007	2.181
External Cites per document	2008	2.275
External Cites per document	2009	3.213
External Cites per document	2010	3.398
External Cites per document	2011	3.495
External Cites per document	2012	3.057
External Cites per document	2013	2.603
External Cites per document	2014	3.807
External Cites per document	2015	3.198
External Cites per document	2016	4.541
Cites per document	1999	1.364
Cites per document	2000	1.794
Cites per document	2001	1.246
Cites per document	2002	1.833
Cites per document	2003	2.583
Cites per document	2004	2.957
Cites per document	2005	2.657
Cites per document	2006	2.972
Cites per document	2007	3.783
Cites per document	2008	4.846
Cites per document	2009	5.926
Cites per document	2010	4.019
Cites per document	2011	4.612
Cites per document	2012	3.746
Cites per document	2013	2.785
Cites per document	2014	4.084
Cites per document	2015	3.432
Cites per document	2016	4.775

% International Collaboration

International Collaboration accounts for the articles that have been produced by researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's documents signed by researchers from more than one country; that is including more than one country address.

Year	International Collaboration
1999	8.70
2000	8.33
2001	23.08
2002	26.09
2003	9.52
2004	28.57
2005	19.23
2006	18.75
2007	20.59
2008	28.57
2009	20.45
2010	22.22
2011	35.42
2012	34.88
2013	31.25
2014	45.24
2015	58.14
2016	35.00

Citable documents

Non-citable documents

Not every article in a journal is considered primary research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three year windows vs. those documents other than research articles, reviews and conference papers.

Documents	Year	Value
Non-citable documents	1999	0
Non-citable documents	2000	0
Non-citable documents	2001	0
Non-citable documents	2002	1
Non-citable documents	2003	1
Non-citable documents	2004	1
Non-citable documents	2005	2
Non-citable documents	2006	3
Non-citable documents	2007	3
Non-citable documents	2008	1
Non-citable documents	2009	0
Non-citable documents	2010	3
Non-citable documents	2011	5
Non-citable documents	2012	6
Non-citable documents	2013	6
Non-citable documents	2014	4
Non-citable documents	2015	6
Non-citable documents	2016	6
Citable documents	1999	66
Citable documents	2000	68
Citable documents	2001	69
Citable documents	2002	72
Citable documents	2003	72
Citable documents	2004	69
Citable documents	2005	70
Citable documents	2006	72
Citable documents	2007	83
Citable documents	2008	91
Citable documents	2009	94
Citable documents	2010	103
Citable documents	2011	103
Citable documents	2012	122
Citable documents	2013	121
Citable documents	2014	119
Citable documents	2015	111
Citable documents	2016	111

Cited documents

Uncited documents

Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those not cited during the following year.

Documents	Year	Value
Uncited documents	1999	25
Uncited documents	2000	28
Uncited documents	2001	32
Uncited documents	2002	21
Uncited documents	2003	26
Uncited documents	2004	17
Uncited documents	2005	18
Uncited documents	2006	18
Uncited documents	2007	0
Uncited documents	2008	0
Uncited documents	2009	0
Uncited documents	2010	23
Uncited documents	2011	26
Uncited documents	2012	39
Uncited documents	2013	34
Uncited documents	2014	29
Uncited documents	2015	24
Uncited documents	2016	16
Cited documents	1999	41
Cited documents	2000	40
Cited documents	2001	37
Cited documents	2002	52
Cited documents	2003	47
Cited documents	2004	53
Cited documents	2005	54
Cited documents	2006	57
Cited documents	2007	86
Cited documents	2008	92
Cited documents	2009	94
Cited documents	2010	83
Cited documents	2011	82
Cited documents	2012	89
Cited documents	2013	93
Cited documents	2014	94
Cited documents	2015	93
Cited documents	2016	101

Show this widget in your own website

Just copy the code below and paste within your html code:

Country	United Kingdom	105 H Index
Subject Area and Category	Business, Management and Accounting Marketing
Publisher	Elsevier Ltd.
Publication type	Journals
ISSN	00224359
Coverage	1993-ongoing
Scope	The Journal of Retailing is devoted to advancing the state of knowledge and its application with respect to all aspects of retailing, its management, evolution, and current theory. The field of retailing includes both products and services, the supply chains and distribution channels that serve retailers, the relationships between retailers and members of the supply channel, and all forms of direct marketing and emerging electric markets to households. Articles may take an economic or behavior approach, but all reflect rigorous analysis and a depth of knowledge of relevant theory and existing literature. Empirical work is based upon the scientific method, modern sampling procedures and statistical analysis. (source)