Industrial Marketing Management

Quartiles

The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.

Category	Year	Quartile
Marketing	1997	Q1
Marketing	1998	Q1
Marketing	1999	Q2
Marketing	2000	Q2
Marketing	2001	Q2
Marketing	2002	Q1
Marketing	2003	Q1
Marketing	2004	Q1
Marketing	2005	Q1
Marketing	2006	Q1
Marketing	2007	Q1
Marketing	2008	Q1
Marketing	2009	Q1
Marketing	2010	Q1
Marketing	2011	Q1
Marketing	2012	Q1
Marketing	2013	Q1
Marketing	2014	Q1
Marketing	2015	Q1
Marketing	2016	Q1

SJR

The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.

Year	SJR
1999	0.548
2000	0.484
2001	0.511
2002	0.695
2003	0.905
2004	0.760
2005	0.821
2006	1.109
2007	1.318
2008	1.047
2009	1.194
2010	1.231
2011	1.037
2012	1.504
2013	1.483
2014	1.609
2015	1.416
2016	1.830

Citations per document

This indicator counts the number of citations received by documents from a journal and divides them by the total number of documents published in that journal. The chart shows the evolution of the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year. The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.

Cites per document	Year	Value
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	1999	0.560
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2000	0.729
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2001	1.058
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2002	1.170
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2003	1.788
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2004	1.811
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2005	2.339
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2006	2.771
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2007	3.149
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2008	3.084
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2009	2.980
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2010	3.686
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2011	3.489
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2012	3.566
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2013	3.451
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2014	4.036
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2015	4.217
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2016	4.078
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	1999	0.560
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2000	0.711
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2001	0.856
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2002	1.204
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2003	1.635
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2004	1.388
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2005	2.238
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2006	2.640
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2007	2.529
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2008	2.769
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2009	2.966
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2010	3.184
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2011	3.009
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2012	3.178
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2013	3.320
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2014	3.839
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2015	3.376
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2016	3.711
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	1999	0.376
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2000	0.613
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2001	0.953
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2002	1.198
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2003	1.103
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2004	1.394
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2005	1.907
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2006	1.833
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2007	1.815
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2008	2.517
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2009	2.422
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2010	2.535
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2011	2.283
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2012	3.000
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2013	2.958
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2014	2.911
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2015	2.633
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2016	3.176

Total Cites

Self-Cites

Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's self-citations received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years.
Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal.

Cites	Year	Value
Self Cites	1999	22
Self Cites	2000	28
Self Cites	2001	12
Self Cites	2002	19
Self Cites	2003	68
Self Cites	2004	44
Self Cites	2005	58
Self Cites	2006	94
Self Cites	2007	88
Self Cites	2008	147
Self Cites	2009	118
Self Cites	2010	189
Self Cites	2011	231
Self Cites	2012	315
Self Cites	2013	415
Self Cites	2014	271
Self Cites	2015	308
Self Cites	2016	321
Total Cites	1999	75
Total Cites	2000	86
Total Cites	2001	107
Total Cites	2002	165
Total Cites	2003	273
Total Cites	2004	254
Total Cites	2005	461
Total Cites	2006	586
Total Cites	2007	612
Total Cites	2008	720
Total Cites	2009	789
Total Cites	2010	882
Total Cites	2011	966
Total Cites	2012	1176
Total Cites	2013	1318
Total Cites	2014	1478
Total Cites	2015	1283
Total Cites	2016	1451

External Cites per Doc

Cites per Doc

Evolution of the number of total citation per document and external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. External citations are calculated by subtracting the number of self-citations from the total number of citations received by the journal’s documents.

Cites	Year	Value
External Cites per document	1999	0.396
External Cites per document	2000	0.479
External Cites per document	2001	0.760
External Cites per document	2002	1.066
External Cites per document	2003	1.228
External Cites per document	2004	1.148
External Cites per document	2005	1.956
External Cites per document	2006	2.216
External Cites per document	2007	2.165
External Cites per document	2008	2.204
External Cites per document	2009	2.523
External Cites per document	2010	2.502
External Cites per document	2011	2.290
External Cites per document	2012	2.327
External Cites per document	2013	2.275
External Cites per document	2014	3.135
External Cites per document	2015	2.566
External Cites per document	2016	2.890
Cites per document	1999	0.560
Cites per document	2000	0.711
Cites per document	2001	0.856
Cites per document	2002	1.204
Cites per document	2003	1.635
Cites per document	2004	1.388
Cites per document	2005	2.238
Cites per document	2006	2.640
Cites per document	2007	2.529
Cites per document	2008	2.769
Cites per document	2009	2.966
Cites per document	2010	3.184
Cites per document	2011	3.009
Cites per document	2012	3.178
Cites per document	2013	3.320
Cites per document	2014	3.839
Cites per document	2015	3.376
Cites per document	2016	3.711

% International Collaboration

International Collaboration accounts for the articles that have been produced by researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's documents signed by researchers from more than one country; that is including more than one country address.

Year	International Collaboration
1999	2.78
2000	4.00
2001	0.00
2002	16.44
2003	27.40
2004	20.73
2005	16.67
2006	23.16
2007	26.00
2008	26.04
2009	24.53
2010	30.82
2011	27.21
2012	39.23
2013	36.76
2014	29.44
2015	46.55
2016	38.64

Citable documents

Non-citable documents

Not every article in a journal is considered primary research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three year windows vs. those documents other than research articles, reviews and conference papers.

Documents	Year	Value
Non-citable documents	1999	0
Non-citable documents	2000	0
Non-citable documents	2001	0
Non-citable documents	2002	0
Non-citable documents	2003	7
Non-citable documents	2004	14
Non-citable documents	2005	22
Non-citable documents	2006	23
Non-citable documents	2007	25
Non-citable documents	2008	25
Non-citable documents	2009	25
Non-citable documents	2010	25
Non-citable documents	2011	27
Non-citable documents	2012	29
Non-citable documents	2013	26
Non-citable documents	2014	28
Non-citable documents	2015	66
Non-citable documents	2016	99
Citable documents	1999	134
Citable documents	2000	121
Citable documents	2001	125
Citable documents	2002	137
Citable documents	2003	167
Citable documents	2004	183
Citable documents	2005	206
Citable documents	2006	222
Citable documents	2007	242
Citable documents	2008	260
Citable documents	2009	266
Citable documents	2010	277
Citable documents	2011	321
Citable documents	2012	370
Citable documents	2013	397
Citable documents	2014	385
Citable documents	2015	380
Citable documents	2016	391

Cited documents

Uncited documents

Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those not cited during the following year.

Documents	Year	Value
Uncited documents	1999	86
Uncited documents	2000	69
Uncited documents	2001	71
Uncited documents	2002	71
Uncited documents	2003	78
Uncited documents	2004	92
Uncited documents	2005	75
Uncited documents	2006	81
Uncited documents	2007	83
Uncited documents	2008	68
Uncited documents	2009	86
Uncited documents	2010	79
Uncited documents	2011	79
Uncited documents	2012	95
Uncited documents	2013	91
Uncited documents	2014	83
Uncited documents	2015	129
Uncited documents	2016	137
Cited documents	1999	48
Cited documents	2000	52
Cited documents	2001	54
Cited documents	2002	66
Cited documents	2003	96
Cited documents	2004	105
Cited documents	2005	153
Cited documents	2006	164
Cited documents	2007	184
Cited documents	2008	217
Cited documents	2009	205
Cited documents	2010	223
Cited documents	2011	269
Cited documents	2012	304
Cited documents	2013	332
Cited documents	2014	330
Cited documents	2015	317
Cited documents	2016	353

Show this widget in your own website

Just copy the code below and paste within your html code:

Country	Netherlands	100 H Index
Subject Area and Category	Business, Management and Accounting Marketing
Publisher	Elsevier BV
Publication type	Journals
ISSN	00198501
Coverage	1971-ongoing
Scope	Industrial Marketing Management provides in-depth case studies geared to the needs of marketing managers, executives and professors. An editorial review board of leading international scholars and practitioners assures a balance of theory and practical applications in all articles. Scholars from North America, Europe, The Pacific Basin and other regions of the globe offer the latest findings for improving effectiveness and efficiency of industrial markets. This comprehensive approach keeps readers abreast of the most timely data and current thinking necessary for better industrial marketing decisions and strategy. (source)