Journal of East Asian Linguistics

Quartiles

The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.

Category	Year	Quartile
History and Philosophy of Science	1997	Q3
History and Philosophy of Science	1998	Q3
History and Philosophy of Science	1999	Q2
History and Philosophy of Science	2000	Q1
History and Philosophy of Science	2001	Q1
History and Philosophy of Science	2002	Q1
History and Philosophy of Science	2003	Q1
History and Philosophy of Science	2004	Q4
History and Philosophy of Science	2005	Q2
History and Philosophy of Science	2006	Q1
History and Philosophy of Science	2007	Q3
History and Philosophy of Science	2008	Q1
History and Philosophy of Science	2009	Q1
History and Philosophy of Science	2010	Q2
History and Philosophy of Science	2011	Q1
History and Philosophy of Science	2012	Q1
History and Philosophy of Science	2013	Q1
History and Philosophy of Science	2014	Q1
History and Philosophy of Science	2015	Q1
History and Philosophy of Science	2016	Q1
Language and Linguistics	1997	Q3
Language and Linguistics	1998	Q3
Language and Linguistics	1999	Q2
Language and Linguistics	2000	Q2
Language and Linguistics	2001	Q1
Language and Linguistics	2002	Q2
Language and Linguistics	2003	Q1
Language and Linguistics	2004	Q4
Language and Linguistics	2005	Q2
Language and Linguistics	2006	Q1
Language and Linguistics	2007	Q2
Language and Linguistics	2008	Q1
Language and Linguistics	2009	Q1
Language and Linguistics	2010	Q2
Language and Linguistics	2011	Q1
Language and Linguistics	2012	Q1
Language and Linguistics	2013	Q1
Language and Linguistics	2014	Q1
Language and Linguistics	2015	Q1
Language and Linguistics	2016	Q1

SJR

The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.

Year	SJR
1999	0.326
2000	0.362
2001	0.576
2002	0.318
2003	0.492
2004	0.101
2005	0.278
2006	0.836
2007	0.167
2008	1.012
2009	0.669
2010	0.403
2011	0.883
2012	0.514
2013	0.656
2014	0.566
2015	0.550
2016	0.541

Citations per document

This indicator counts the number of citations received by documents from a journal and divides them by the total number of documents published in that journal. The chart shows the evolution of the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year. The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.

Cites per document	Year	Value
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	1999	0.194
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2000	0.262
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2001	0.357
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2002	0.256
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2003	0.500
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2004	0.227
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2005	0.442
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2006	0.537
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2007	0.488
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2008	0.767
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2009	0.660
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2010	0.643
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2011	0.818
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2012	0.733
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2013	0.600
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2014	0.481
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2015	0.696
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2016	0.574
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	1999	0.194
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2000	0.258
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2001	0.344
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2002	0.242
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2003	0.364
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2004	0.182
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2005	0.531
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2006	0.633
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2007	0.333
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2008	0.788
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2009	0.537
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2010	0.578
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2011	0.738
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2012	0.605
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2013	0.650
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2014	0.476
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2015	0.711
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2016	0.629
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	1999	0.150
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2000	0.238
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2001	0.227
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2002	0.273
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2003	0.182
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2004	0.136
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2005	0.619
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2006	0.526
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2007	0.300
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2008	0.583
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2009	0.500
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2010	0.375
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2011	0.400
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2012	0.571
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2013	0.467
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2014	0.542
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2015	0.615
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2016	0.913

Total Cites

Self-Cites

Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's self-citations received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years.
Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal.

Cites	Year	Value
Self Cites	1999	0
Self Cites	2000	4
Self Cites	2001	2
Self Cites	2002	3
Self Cites	2003	4
Self Cites	2004	2
Self Cites	2005	2
Self Cites	2006	0
Self Cites	2007	0
Self Cites	2008	4
Self Cites	2009	3
Self Cites	2010	2
Self Cites	2011	7
Self Cites	2012	1
Self Cites	2013	3
Self Cites	2014	1
Self Cites	2015	4
Self Cites	2016	4
Total Cites	1999	6
Total Cites	2000	8
Total Cites	2001	11
Total Cites	2002	8
Total Cites	2003	12
Total Cites	2004	6
Total Cites	2005	17
Total Cites	2006	19
Total Cites	2007	10
Total Cites	2008	26
Total Cites	2009	22
Total Cites	2010	26
Total Cites	2011	31
Total Cites	2012	26
Total Cites	2013	26
Total Cites	2014	20
Total Cites	2015	27
Total Cites	2016	22

External Cites per Doc

Cites per Doc

Evolution of the number of total citation per document and external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. External citations are calculated by subtracting the number of self-citations from the total number of citations received by the journal’s documents.

Cites	Year	Value
External Cites per document	1999	0.194
External Cites per document	2000	0.129
External Cites per document	2001	0.281
External Cites per document	2002	0.152
External Cites per document	2003	0.242
External Cites per document	2004	0.121
External Cites per document	2005	0.469
External Cites per document	2006	0.633
External Cites per document	2007	0.333
External Cites per document	2008	0.667
External Cites per document	2009	0.463
External Cites per document	2010	0.533
External Cites per document	2011	0.571
External Cites per document	2012	0.581
External Cites per document	2013	0.575
External Cites per document	2014	0.452
External Cites per document	2015	0.605
External Cites per document	2016	0.514
Cites per document	1999	0.194
Cites per document	2000	0.258
Cites per document	2001	0.344
Cites per document	2002	0.242
Cites per document	2003	0.364
Cites per document	2004	0.182
Cites per document	2005	0.531
Cites per document	2006	0.633
Cites per document	2007	0.333
Cites per document	2008	0.788
Cites per document	2009	0.537
Cites per document	2010	0.578
Cites per document	2011	0.738
Cites per document	2012	0.605
Cites per document	2013	0.650
Cites per document	2014	0.476
Cites per document	2015	0.711
Cites per document	2016	0.629

% International Collaboration

International Collaboration accounts for the articles that have been produced by researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's documents signed by researchers from more than one country; that is including more than one country address.

Year	International Collaboration
1999	9.09
2000	0.00
2001	0.00
2002	18.18
2003	18.18
2004	30.00
2005	22.22
2006	9.09
2007	7.69
2008	17.65
2009	26.67
2010	20.00
2011	11.11
2012	8.33
2013	15.38
2014	6.25
2015	33.33
2016	25.00

Citable documents

Non-citable documents

Not every article in a journal is considered primary research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three year windows vs. those documents other than research articles, reviews and conference papers.

Documents	Year	Value
Non-citable documents	1999	0
Non-citable documents	2000	0
Non-citable documents	2001	0
Non-citable documents	2002	0
Non-citable documents	2003	0
Non-citable documents	2004	0
Non-citable documents	2005	0
Non-citable documents	2006	0
Non-citable documents	2007	0
Non-citable documents	2008	0
Non-citable documents	2009	0
Non-citable documents	2010	0
Non-citable documents	2011	0
Non-citable documents	2012	0
Non-citable documents	2013	0
Non-citable documents	2014	1
Non-citable documents	2015	3
Non-citable documents	2016	3
Citable documents	1999	31
Citable documents	2000	31
Citable documents	2001	32
Citable documents	2002	33
Citable documents	2003	33
Citable documents	2004	33
Citable documents	2005	32
Citable documents	2006	30
Citable documents	2007	30
Citable documents	2008	33
Citable documents	2009	41
Citable documents	2010	45
Citable documents	2011	42
Citable documents	2012	43
Citable documents	2013	40
Citable documents	2014	42
Citable documents	2015	38
Citable documents	2016	35

Cited documents

Uncited documents

Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those not cited during the following year.

Documents	Year	Value
Uncited documents	1999	28
Uncited documents	2000	25
Uncited documents	2001	23
Uncited documents	2002	26
Uncited documents	2003	24
Uncited documents	2004	27
Uncited documents	2005	19
Uncited documents	2006	20
Uncited documents	2007	21
Uncited documents	2008	23
Uncited documents	2009	27
Uncited documents	2010	29
Uncited documents	2011	28
Uncited documents	2012	24
Uncited documents	2013	25
Uncited documents	2014	30
Uncited documents	2015	22
Uncited documents	2016	26
Cited documents	1999	3
Cited documents	2000	6
Cited documents	2001	9
Cited documents	2002	7
Cited documents	2003	9
Cited documents	2004	6
Cited documents	2005	13
Cited documents	2006	10
Cited documents	2007	9
Cited documents	2008	10
Cited documents	2009	14
Cited documents	2010	16
Cited documents	2011	14
Cited documents	2012	19
Cited documents	2013	15
Cited documents	2014	13
Cited documents	2015	19
Cited documents	2016	12

Show this widget in your own website

Just copy the code below and paste within your html code:

Country	Netherlands	23 H Index
Subject Area and Category	Arts and Humanities History and Philosophy of Science Language and Linguistics
Publisher	Kluwer Academic Publishers
Publication type	Journals
ISSN	09258558, 15728560
Coverage	1992-ongoing
Scope	The study of East Asian languages, especially of Chinese, Japanese and Korean, has existed for a long time as a field, as demonstrated by the existence of programs in most institutions of higher learning and research that include these languages as a major component. Speakers of these three languages have shared a great deal of linguistic heritage during the development of their languages through cultural contacts, in addition to possible genealogical linkage. These languages accordingly possess various common features. Another important factor that ties them together as a field is that they have shared a common tradition of linguistic scholarship, a tradition that distinguishes itself from the study of western languages. (source)