Current Allergy and Asthma Reports

Quartiles

The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.

Category	Year	Quartile
Immunology and Allergy	2002	Q4
Immunology and Allergy	2003	Q3
Immunology and Allergy	2004	Q3
Immunology and Allergy	2005	Q2
Immunology and Allergy	2006	Q2
Immunology and Allergy	2007	Q3
Immunology and Allergy	2008	Q2
Immunology and Allergy	2009	Q2
Immunology and Allergy	2010	Q2
Immunology and Allergy	2011	Q2
Immunology and Allergy	2012	Q2
Immunology and Allergy	2013	Q2
Immunology and Allergy	2014	Q2
Immunology and Allergy	2015	Q2
Immunology and Allergy	2016	Q2
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine	2002	Q3
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine	2003	Q2
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine	2004	Q2
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine	2005	Q2
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine	2006	Q2
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine	2007	Q2
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine	2008	Q2
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine	2009	Q2
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine	2010	Q2
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine	2011	Q2
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine	2012	Q2
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine	2013	Q2
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine	2014	Q2
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine	2015	Q2
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine	2016	Q2

SJR

The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.

Year	SJR
2002	0.135
2003	0.375
2004	0.511
2005	0.588
2006	0.760
2007	0.652
2008	0.715
2009	0.672
2010	0.786
2011	0.966
2012	0.843
2013	0.853
2014	0.996
2015	0.915
2016	0.911

Citations per document

This indicator counts the number of citations received by documents from a journal and divides them by the total number of documents published in that journal. The chart shows the evolution of the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year. The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.

Cites per document	Year	Value
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2002	0.278
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2003	1.299
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2004	1.533
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2005	1.750
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2006	2.261
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2007	1.933
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2008	2.274
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2009	2.273
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2010	2.417
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2011	2.933
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2012	2.939
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2013	2.815
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2014	3.478
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2015	2.805
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2016	2.625
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2002	0.278
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2003	1.299
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2004	1.533
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2005	2.016
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2006	2.524
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2007	2.005
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2008	2.279
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2009	2.250
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2010	2.741
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2011	2.985
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2012	2.949
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2013	2.985
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2014	3.528
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2015	2.736
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2016	2.737
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2002	0.278
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2003	1.299
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2004	1.718
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2005	2.388
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2006	2.574
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2007	1.870
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2008	2.008
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2009	2.352
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2010	2.623
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2011	2.885
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2012	3.238
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2013	3.034
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2014	3.472
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2015	2.621
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2016	2.478

Total Cites

Self-Cites

Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's self-citations received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years.
Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal.

Cites	Year	Value
Self Cites	2002	0
Self Cites	2003	10
Self Cites	2004	10
Self Cites	2005	11
Self Cites	2006	9
Self Cites	2007	8
Self Cites	2008	11
Self Cites	2009	5
Self Cites	2010	4
Self Cites	2011	14
Self Cites	2012	24
Self Cites	2013	15
Self Cites	2014	20
Self Cites	2015	27
Self Cites	2016	39
Total Cites	2002	22
Total Cites	2003	191
Total Cites	2004	322
Total Cites	2005	381
Total Cites	2006	467
Total Cites	2007	379
Total Cites	2008	433
Total Cites	2009	432
Total Cites	2010	540
Total Cites	2011	585
Total Cites	2012	584
Total Cites	2013	606
Total Cites	2014	815
Total Cites	2015	810
Total Cites	2016	906

External Cites per Doc

Cites per Doc

Evolution of the number of total citation per document and external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. External citations are calculated by subtracting the number of self-citations from the total number of citations received by the journal’s documents.

Cites	Year	Value
External Cites per document	2002	0.278
External Cites per document	2003	1.231
External Cites per document	2004	1.486
External Cites per document	2005	1.958
External Cites per document	2006	2.476
External Cites per document	2007	1.963
External Cites per document	2008	2.221
External Cites per document	2009	2.224
External Cites per document	2010	2.721
External Cites per document	2011	2.913
External Cites per document	2012	2.828
External Cites per document	2013	2.911
External Cites per document	2014	3.442
External Cites per document	2015	2.645
External Cites per document	2016	2.619
Cites per document	2002	0.278
Cites per document	2003	1.299
Cites per document	2004	1.533
Cites per document	2005	2.016
Cites per document	2006	2.524
Cites per document	2007	2.005
Cites per document	2008	2.279
Cites per document	2009	2.250
Cites per document	2010	2.741
Cites per document	2011	2.985
Cites per document	2012	2.949
Cites per document	2013	2.985
Cites per document	2014	3.528
Cites per document	2015	2.736
Cites per document	2016	2.737

% International Collaboration

International Collaboration accounts for the articles that have been produced by researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's documents signed by researchers from more than one country; that is including more than one country address.

Year	International Collaboration
2002	0.00
2003	0.00
2004	0.00
2005	0.00
2006	0.00
2007	0.00
2008	0.00
2009	0.00
2010	7.04
2011	11.69
2012	13.92
2013	11.63
2014	10.81
2015	12.39
2016	10.28

Citable documents

Non-citable documents

Not every article in a journal is considered primary research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three year windows vs. those documents other than research articles, reviews and conference papers.

Documents	Year	Value
Non-citable documents	2002	0
Non-citable documents	2003	0
Non-citable documents	2004	6
Non-citable documents	2005	10
Non-citable documents	2006	15
Non-citable documents	2007	12
Non-citable documents	2008	13
Non-citable documents	2009	12
Non-citable documents	2010	10
Non-citable documents	2011	18
Non-citable documents	2012	23
Non-citable documents	2013	24
Non-citable documents	2014	11
Non-citable documents	2015	17
Non-citable documents	2016	16
Citable documents	2002	79
Citable documents	2003	147
Citable documents	2004	210
Citable documents	2005	189
Citable documents	2006	185
Citable documents	2007	189
Citable documents	2008	190
Citable documents	2009	192
Citable documents	2010	197
Citable documents	2011	196
Citable documents	2012	198
Citable documents	2013	203
Citable documents	2014	231
Citable documents	2015	296
Citable documents	2016	331

Cited documents

Uncited documents

Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those not cited during the following year.

Documents	Year	Value
Uncited documents	2002	62
Uncited documents	2003	56
Uncited documents	2004	78
Uncited documents	2005	56
Uncited documents	2006	49
Uncited documents	2007	63
Uncited documents	2008	59
Uncited documents	2009	46
Uncited documents	2010	50
Uncited documents	2011	65
Uncited documents	2012	66
Uncited documents	2013	58
Uncited documents	2014	40
Uncited documents	2015	87
Uncited documents	2016	77
Cited documents	2002	17
Cited documents	2003	91
Cited documents	2004	138
Cited documents	2005	143
Cited documents	2006	151
Cited documents	2007	138
Cited documents	2008	144
Cited documents	2009	158
Cited documents	2010	157
Cited documents	2011	149
Cited documents	2012	155
Cited documents	2013	169
Cited documents	2014	202
Cited documents	2015	226
Cited documents	2016	270

Show this widget in your own website

Just copy the code below and paste within your html code:

Country	United States	50 H Index
Subject Area and Category	Medicine Immunology and Allergy Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Publisher	Current Science Inc.
Publication type	Journals
ISSN	15297322, 15346315
Coverage	2001-ongoing
Scope	The aim of this journal is to provide the reader, in a systematic manner, the views of experts on current advances in the allergy and asthma field in a clear and readable form and by providing reviews which highlight the most important papers recently published from the wealth of original publications. We accomplish this by appointing authorities in 12 major subject areas across the discipline to select topics for review by leading experts, emphasizing recent developments and highlighting important papers recently published on their topics. Current Allergy and Asthma Reports also provides the reader with supplementary reviews featuring recently published case reports, valuable web sites, and commentaries from well-known figures in the field. (source)