Research in Higher Education

Quartiles

The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.

Category	Year	Quartile
Education	1997	Q2
Education	1998	Q1
Education	1999	Q1
Education	2000	Q2
Education	2001	Q2
Education	2002	Q1
Education	2003	Q1
Education	2004	Q1
Education	2005	Q1
Education	2006	Q1
Education	2007	Q1
Education	2008	Q1
Education	2009	Q1
Education	2010	Q1
Education	2011	Q1
Education	2012	Q1
Education	2013	Q1
Education	2014	Q1
Education	2015	Q1
Education	2016	Q1

SJR

The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.

Year	SJR
1999	0.754
2000	0.452
2001	0.527
2002	0.770
2003	0.755
2004	0.869
2005	0.576
2006	0.824
2007	1.053
2008	1.146
2009	2.357
2010	2.246
2011	2.955
2012	2.243
2013	1.535
2014	1.720
2015	1.885
2016	1.913

Citations per document

This indicator counts the number of citations received by documents from a journal and divides them by the total number of documents published in that journal. The chart shows the evolution of the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year. The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.

Cites per document	Year	Value
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	1999	0.647
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2000	0.543
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2001	0.629
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2002	0.552
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2003	0.700
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2004	0.808
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2005	1.214
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2006	1.551
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2007	1.572
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2008	1.899
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2009	2.224
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2010	2.222
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2011	2.568
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2012	2.390
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2013	2.569
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2014	2.422
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2015	2.428
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2016	2.458
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	1999	0.647
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2000	0.425
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2001	0.618
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2002	0.500
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2003	0.606
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2004	0.868
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2005	1.131
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2006	1.444
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2007	1.254
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2008	1.583
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2009	2.055
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2010	1.871
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2011	2.430
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2012	2.226
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2013	1.864
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2014	2.226
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2015	2.268
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2016	1.915
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	1999	0.443
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2000	0.368
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2001	0.571
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2002	0.439
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2003	0.567
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2004	0.797
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2005	0.958
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2006	1.234
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2007	1.054
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2008	1.338
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2009	1.411
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2010	1.720
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2011	2.173
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2012	1.417
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2013	1.590
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2014	1.947
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2015	1.568
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2016	1.739

Total Cites

Self-Cites

Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's self-citations received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years.
Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal.

Cites	Year	Value
Self Cites	1999	19
Self Cites	2000	7
Self Cites	2001	20
Self Cites	2002	15
Self Cites	2003	20
Self Cites	2004	20
Self Cites	2005	31
Self Cites	2006	44
Self Cites	2007	24
Self Cites	2008	39
Self Cites	2009	43
Self Cites	2010	18
Self Cites	2011	40
Self Cites	2012	35
Self Cites	2013	30
Self Cites	2014	20
Self Cites	2015	17
Self Cites	2016	37
Total Cites	1999	66
Total Cites	2000	45
Total Cites	2001	63
Total Cites	2002	51
Total Cites	2003	57
Total Cites	2004	79
Total Cites	2005	112
Total Cites	2006	156
Total Cites	2007	143
Total Cites	2008	171
Total Cites	2009	226
Total Cites	2010	217
Total Cites	2011	277
Total Cites	2012	256
Total Cites	2013	205
Total Cites	2014	256
Total Cites	2015	254
Total Cites	2016	203

External Cites per Doc

Cites per Doc

Evolution of the number of total citation per document and external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. External citations are calculated by subtracting the number of self-citations from the total number of citations received by the journal’s documents.

Cites	Year	Value
External Cites per document	1999	0.461
External Cites per document	2000	0.358
External Cites per document	2001	0.422
External Cites per document	2002	0.353
External Cites per document	2003	0.394
External Cites per document	2004	0.648
External Cites per document	2005	0.818
External Cites per document	2006	1.037
External Cites per document	2007	1.044
External Cites per document	2008	1.222
External Cites per document	2009	1.664
External Cites per document	2010	1.716
External Cites per document	2011	2.079
External Cites per document	2012	1.922
External Cites per document	2013	1.591
External Cites per document	2014	2.052
External Cites per document	2015	2.116
External Cites per document	2016	1.566
Cites per document	1999	0.647
Cites per document	2000	0.425
Cites per document	2001	0.618
Cites per document	2002	0.500
Cites per document	2003	0.606
Cites per document	2004	0.868
Cites per document	2005	1.131
Cites per document	2006	1.444
Cites per document	2007	1.254
Cites per document	2008	1.583
Cites per document	2009	2.055
Cites per document	2010	1.871
Cites per document	2011	2.430
Cites per document	2012	2.226
Cites per document	2013	1.864
Cites per document	2014	2.226
Cites per document	2015	2.268
Cites per document	2016	1.915

% International Collaboration

International Collaboration accounts for the articles that have been produced by researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's documents signed by researchers from more than one country; that is including more than one country address.

Year	International Collaboration
1999	5.56
2000	0.00
2001	3.13
2002	0.00
2003	3.23
2004	0.00
2005	2.70
2006	8.11
2007	5.88
2008	2.50
2009	6.98
2010	6.25
2011	12.20
2012	5.26
2013	15.38
2014	4.88
2015	12.12
2016	10.00

Citable documents

Non-citable documents

Not every article in a journal is considered primary research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three year windows vs. those documents other than research articles, reviews and conference papers.

Documents	Year	Value
Non-citable documents	1999	0
Non-citable documents	2000	0
Non-citable documents	2001	0
Non-citable documents	2002	0
Non-citable documents	2003	0
Non-citable documents	2004	0
Non-citable documents	2005	0
Non-citable documents	2006	0
Non-citable documents	2007	0
Non-citable documents	2008	0
Non-citable documents	2009	1
Non-citable documents	2010	1
Non-citable documents	2011	1
Non-citable documents	2012	1
Non-citable documents	2013	1
Non-citable documents	2014	3
Non-citable documents	2015	6
Non-citable documents	2016	7
Citable documents	1999	102
Citable documents	2000	106
Citable documents	2001	102
Citable documents	2002	102
Citable documents	2003	94
Citable documents	2004	91
Citable documents	2005	99
Citable documents	2006	108
Citable documents	2007	114
Citable documents	2008	108
Citable documents	2009	110
Citable documents	2010	116
Citable documents	2011	114
Citable documents	2012	115
Citable documents	2013	110
Citable documents	2014	115
Citable documents	2015	112
Citable documents	2016	106

Cited documents

Uncited documents

Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those not cited during the following year.

Documents	Year	Value
Uncited documents	1999	65
Uncited documents	2000	73
Uncited documents	2001	65
Uncited documents	2002	67
Uncited documents	2003	56
Uncited documents	2004	47
Uncited documents	2005	46
Uncited documents	2006	45
Uncited documents	2007	43
Uncited documents	2008	39
Uncited documents	2009	26
Uncited documents	2010	36
Uncited documents	2011	34
Uncited documents	2012	30
Uncited documents	2013	26
Uncited documents	2014	30
Uncited documents	2015	35
Uncited documents	2016	31
Cited documents	1999	37
Cited documents	2000	33
Cited documents	2001	37
Cited documents	2002	35
Cited documents	2003	38
Cited documents	2004	44
Cited documents	2005	53
Cited documents	2006	63
Cited documents	2007	71
Cited documents	2008	69
Cited documents	2009	85
Cited documents	2010	81
Cited documents	2011	81
Cited documents	2012	86
Cited documents	2013	85
Cited documents	2014	88
Cited documents	2015	83
Cited documents	2016	82

Show this widget in your own website

Just copy the code below and paste within your html code:

Country	Netherlands	64 H Index
Subject Area and Category	Social Sciences Education
Publisher	Kluwer Academic Publishers
Publication type	Journals
ISSN	03610365, 1573188X
Coverage	1973-ongoing
Scope	Research in Higher Education is directed to those concerned with the functioning of the post-secondary education, including two-year and four-year colleges, universities, and graduate and professional schools. It is of primary interest to institutional researchers and planners, faculty, college and university administrators, student personnel specialists and behavioral scientists. Generally, empirical studies are sought which contribute to an increased understanding of an institution or allow comparison between institutions, which aid faculty and administrators in making more informed decisions about current or future operations, and which improve the efficiency or effectiveness of the institution. (source)