Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

Quartiles

The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.

Category	Year	Quartile
Bioengineering	1998	Q4
Bioengineering	1999	Q3
Bioengineering	2000	Q2
Bioengineering	2001	Q3
Bioengineering	2002	Q3
Bioengineering	2003	Q3
Bioengineering	2004	Q3
Bioengineering	2005	Q3
Bioengineering	2006	Q2
Bioengineering	2007	Q3
Bioengineering	2008	Q3
Bioengineering	2009	Q3
Bioengineering	2010	Q2
Bioengineering	2011	Q3
Bioengineering	2012	Q3
Bioengineering	2013	Q3
Bioengineering	2014	Q3
Bioengineering	2015	Q3
Bioengineering	2016	Q2
Biomedical Engineering	1998	Q4
Biomedical Engineering	1999	Q2
Biomedical Engineering	2000	Q2
Biomedical Engineering	2001	Q3
Biomedical Engineering	2002	Q3
Biomedical Engineering	2003	Q2
Biomedical Engineering	2004	Q2
Biomedical Engineering	2005	Q3
Biomedical Engineering	2006	Q2
Biomedical Engineering	2007	Q3
Biomedical Engineering	2008	Q3
Biomedical Engineering	2009	Q3
Biomedical Engineering	2010	Q2
Biomedical Engineering	2011	Q2
Biomedical Engineering	2012	Q2
Biomedical Engineering	2013	Q2
Biomedical Engineering	2014	Q3
Biomedical Engineering	2015	Q3
Biomedical Engineering	2016	Q2
Computer Science Applications	1998	Q3
Computer Science Applications	1999	Q2
Computer Science Applications	2000	Q2
Computer Science Applications	2001	Q3
Computer Science Applications	2002	Q3
Computer Science Applications	2003	Q3
Computer Science Applications	2004	Q2
Computer Science Applications	2005	Q3
Computer Science Applications	2006	Q2
Computer Science Applications	2007	Q3
Computer Science Applications	2008	Q2
Computer Science Applications	2009	Q2
Computer Science Applications	2010	Q2
Computer Science Applications	2011	Q2
Computer Science Applications	2012	Q3
Computer Science Applications	2013	Q3
Computer Science Applications	2014	Q3
Computer Science Applications	2015	Q3
Computer Science Applications	2016	Q2
Human-Computer Interaction	1998	Q3
Human-Computer Interaction	1999	Q2
Human-Computer Interaction	2000	Q2
Human-Computer Interaction	2001	Q3
Human-Computer Interaction	2002	Q3
Human-Computer Interaction	2003	Q2
Human-Computer Interaction	2004	Q2
Human-Computer Interaction	2005	Q3
Human-Computer Interaction	2006	Q2
Human-Computer Interaction	2007	Q3
Human-Computer Interaction	2008	Q2
Human-Computer Interaction	2009	Q2
Human-Computer Interaction	2010	Q2
Human-Computer Interaction	2011	Q2
Human-Computer Interaction	2012	Q2
Human-Computer Interaction	2013	Q3
Human-Computer Interaction	2014	Q3
Human-Computer Interaction	2015	Q2
Human-Computer Interaction	2016	Q2

SJR

The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.

Year	SJR
1999	0.446
2000	0.489
2001	0.372
2002	0.398
2003	0.489
2004	0.477
2005	0.386
2006	0.620
2007	0.370
2008	0.475
2009	0.528
2010	0.635
2011	0.502
2012	0.408
2013	0.390
2014	0.317
2015	0.394
2016	0.505

Citations per document

This indicator counts the number of citations received by documents from a journal and divides them by the total number of documents published in that journal. The chart shows the evolution of the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year. The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.

Cites per document	Year	Value
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	1999	0.762
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2000	0.674
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2001	0.924
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2002	0.814
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2003	0.897
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2004	1.015
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2005	1.206
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2006	1.412
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2007	1.213
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2008	1.302
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2009	1.605
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2010	1.613
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2011	1.698
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2012	1.258
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2013	0.899
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2014	0.826
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2015	0.886
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2016	0.997
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	1999	0.762
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2000	0.674
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2001	0.661
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2002	0.787
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2003	0.853
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2004	1.000
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2005	1.099
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2006	1.472
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2007	1.010
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2008	1.319
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2009	1.622
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2010	1.592
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2011	1.611
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2012	1.077
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2013	0.815
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2014	0.728
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2015	0.893
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2016	1.146
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	1999	0.762
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2000	0.455
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2001	0.756
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2002	0.736
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2003	0.861
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2004	0.872
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2005	1.029
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2006	1.200
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2007	0.847
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2008	1.291
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2009	1.670
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2010	1.552
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2011	1.323
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2012	0.902
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2013	0.638
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2014	0.676
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2015	1.056
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2016	1.295

Total Cites

Self-Cites

Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's self-citations received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years.
Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal.

Cites	Year	Value
Self Cites	1999	2
Self Cites	2000	1
Self Cites	2001	6
Self Cites	2002	7
Self Cites	2003	5
Self Cites	2004	11
Self Cites	2005	12
Self Cites	2006	35
Self Cites	2007	9
Self Cites	2008	6
Self Cites	2009	10
Self Cites	2010	11
Self Cites	2011	19
Self Cites	2012	21
Self Cites	2013	42
Self Cites	2014	46
Self Cites	2015	52
Self Cites	2016	57
Total Cites	1999	16
Total Cites	2000	29
Total Cites	2001	37
Total Cites	2002	59
Total Cites	2003	81
Total Cites	2004	108
Total Cites	2005	122
Total Cites	2006	156
Total Cites	2007	106
Total Cites	2008	153
Total Cites	2009	219
Total Cites	2010	269
Total Cites	2011	340
Total Cites	2012	394
Total Cites	2013	541
Total Cites	2014	618
Total Cites	2015	802
Total Cites	2016	839

External Cites per Doc

Cites per Doc

Evolution of the number of total citation per document and external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. External citations are calculated by subtracting the number of self-citations from the total number of citations received by the journal’s documents.

Cites	Year	Value
External Cites per document	1999	0.667
External Cites per document	2000	0.651
External Cites per document	2001	0.554
External Cites per document	2002	0.693
External Cites per document	2003	0.800
External Cites per document	2004	0.898
External Cites per document	2005	0.991
External Cites per document	2006	1.142
External Cites per document	2007	0.924
External Cites per document	2008	1.267
External Cites per document	2009	1.548
External Cites per document	2010	1.527
External Cites per document	2011	1.521
External Cites per document	2012	1.019
External Cites per document	2013	0.752
External Cites per document	2014	0.674
External Cites per document	2015	0.835
External Cites per document	2016	1.068
Cites per document	1999	0.762
Cites per document	2000	0.674
Cites per document	2001	0.661
Cites per document	2002	0.787
Cites per document	2003	0.853
Cites per document	2004	1.000
Cites per document	2005	1.099
Cites per document	2006	1.472
Cites per document	2007	1.010
Cites per document	2008	1.319
Cites per document	2009	1.622
Cites per document	2010	1.592
Cites per document	2011	1.611
Cites per document	2012	1.077
Cites per document	2013	0.815
Cites per document	2014	0.728
Cites per document	2015	0.893
Cites per document	2016	1.146

% International Collaboration

International Collaboration accounts for the articles that have been produced by researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's documents signed by researchers from more than one country; that is including more than one country address.

Year	International Collaboration
1999	22.73
2000	17.39
2001	13.33
2002	9.52
2003	21.62
2004	24.24
2005	10.53
2006	22.22
2007	17.78
2008	15.25
2009	20.29
2010	25.00
2011	22.79
2012	11.76
2013	24.00
2014	25.19
2015	25.41
2016	27.53

Citable documents

Non-citable documents

Not every article in a journal is considered primary research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three year windows vs. those documents other than research articles, reviews and conference papers.

Documents	Year	Value
Non-citable documents	1999	1
Non-citable documents	2000	1
Non-citable documents	2001	0
Non-citable documents	2002	0
Non-citable documents	2003	0
Non-citable documents	2004	1
Non-citable documents	2005	1
Non-citable documents	2006	2
Non-citable documents	2007	2
Non-citable documents	2008	3
Non-citable documents	2009	5
Non-citable documents	2010	4
Non-citable documents	2011	5
Non-citable documents	2012	6
Non-citable documents	2013	13
Non-citable documents	2014	15
Non-citable documents	2015	21
Non-citable documents	2016	116
Citable documents	1999	21
Citable documents	2000	43
Citable documents	2001	56
Citable documents	2002	75
Citable documents	2003	95
Citable documents	2004	108
Citable documents	2005	111
Citable documents	2006	106
Citable documents	2007	105
Citable documents	2008	116
Citable documents	2009	135
Citable documents	2010	169
Citable documents	2011	211
Citable documents	2012	366
Citable documents	2013	664
Citable documents	2014	849
Citable documents	2015	898
Citable documents	2016	732

Cited documents

Uncited documents

Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those not cited during the following year.

Documents	Year	Value
Uncited documents	1999	13
Uncited documents	2000	28
Uncited documents	2001	33
Uncited documents	2002	42
Uncited documents	2003	47
Uncited documents	2004	52
Uncited documents	2005	49
Uncited documents	2006	42
Uncited documents	2007	50
Uncited documents	2008	49
Uncited documents	2009	60
Uncited documents	2010	74
Uncited documents	2011	88
Uncited documents	2012	199
Uncited documents	2013	425
Uncited documents	2014	560
Uncited documents	2015	563
Uncited documents	2016	474
Cited documents	1999	9
Cited documents	2000	16
Cited documents	2001	23
Cited documents	2002	33
Cited documents	2003	48
Cited documents	2004	57
Cited documents	2005	63
Cited documents	2006	66
Cited documents	2007	57
Cited documents	2008	70
Cited documents	2009	80
Cited documents	2010	99
Cited documents	2011	128
Cited documents	2012	173
Cited documents	2013	252
Cited documents	2014	304
Cited documents	2015	356
Cited documents	2016	374

Show this widget in your own website

Just copy the code below and paste within your html code:

Country	United Kingdom	45 H Index
Subject Area and Category	Chemical Engineering Bioengineering Computer Science Computer Science Applications Human-Computer Interaction Engineering Biomedical Engineering
Publisher	Taylor & Francis
Publication type	Journals
ISSN	10255842
Coverage	1997-ongoing
Scope	The primary aims of Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering are to provide a means of communicating the advances being made in the areas of biomechanics and biomedical engineering and to stimulate interest in the continually emerging computer based technologies which are being applied in these multidisciplinary subjects. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering will also provide a focus for the importance of integrating the disciplines of engineering with medical technology and clinical expertise. Such integration will have a major impact on health care in the future. (source)