Gayana - Botanica

Quartiles

The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.

Category	Year	Quartile
Ecology	2003	Q4
Ecology	2004	Q4
Ecology	2005	Q3
Ecology	2006	Q3
Ecology	2007	Q3
Ecology	2008	Q4
Ecology	2009	Q3
Ecology	2010	Q3
Ecology	2011	Q3
Ecology	2012	Q3
Ecology	2013	Q4
Ecology	2014	Q4
Ecology	2015	Q4
Ecology	2016	Q3
Horticulture	2003	Q4
Horticulture	2004	Q4
Horticulture	2005	Q4
Horticulture	2006	Q3
Horticulture	2007	Q3
Horticulture	2008	Q4
Horticulture	2009	Q3
Horticulture	2010	Q3
Horticulture	2011	Q4
Horticulture	2012	Q3
Horticulture	2013	Q4
Horticulture	2014	Q4
Horticulture	2015	Q4
Horticulture	2016	Q3
Plant Science	2003	Q4
Plant Science	2004	Q4
Plant Science	2005	Q3
Plant Science	2006	Q3
Plant Science	2007	Q3
Plant Science	2008	Q4
Plant Science	2009	Q3
Plant Science	2010	Q3
Plant Science	2011	Q4
Plant Science	2012	Q3
Plant Science	2013	Q4
Plant Science	2014	Q4
Plant Science	2015	Q4
Plant Science	2016	Q3

SJR

The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.

Year	SJR
2003	0.112
2004	0.131
2005	0.205
2006	0.235
2007	0.238
2008	0.126
2009	0.202
2010	0.219
2011	0.206
2012	0.252
2013	0.163
2014	0.174
2015	0.143
2016	0.250

Citations per document

This indicator counts the number of citations received by documents from a journal and divides them by the total number of documents published in that journal. The chart shows the evolution of the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year. The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.

Cites per document	Year	Value
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2003	0.231
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2004	0.121
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2005	0.319
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2006	0.286
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2007	0.508
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2008	0.118
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2009	0.295
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2010	0.330
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2011	0.364
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2012	0.437
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2013	0.312
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2014	0.286
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2015	0.291
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2016	0.478
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2003	0.231
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2004	0.121
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2005	0.319
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2006	0.300
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2007	0.444
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2008	0.093
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2009	0.323
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2010	0.291
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2011	0.369
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2012	0.441
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2013	0.216
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2014	0.278
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2015	0.179
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2016	0.481
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2003	0.231
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2004	0.121
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2005	0.353
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2006	0.100
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2007	0.452
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2008	0.132
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2009	0.277
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2010	0.232
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2011	0.400
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2012	0.443
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2013	0.186
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2014	0.154
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2015	0.235
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2016	0.357

Total Cites

Self-Cites

Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's self-citations received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years.
Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal.

Cites	Year	Value
Self Cites	2003	1
Self Cites	2004	1
Self Cites	2005	5
Self Cites	2006	4
Self Cites	2007	9
Self Cites	2008	1
Self Cites	2009	10
Self Cites	2010	6
Self Cites	2011	9
Self Cites	2012	12
Self Cites	2013	4
Self Cites	2014	4
Self Cites	2015	6
Self Cites	2016	13
Total Cites	2003	3
Total Cites	2004	4
Total Cites	2005	15
Total Cites	2006	15
Total Cites	2007	20
Total Cites	2008	5
Total Cites	2009	20
Total Cites	2010	23
Total Cites	2011	31
Total Cites	2012	45
Total Cites	2013	27
Total Cites	2014	37
Total Cites	2015	22
Total Cites	2016	51

External Cites per Doc

Cites per Doc

Evolution of the number of total citation per document and external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. External citations are calculated by subtracting the number of self-citations from the total number of citations received by the journal’s documents.

Cites	Year	Value
External Cites per document	2003	0.154
External Cites per document	2004	0.091
External Cites per document	2005	0.213
External Cites per document	2006	0.220
External Cites per document	2007	0.244
External Cites per document	2008	0.074
External Cites per document	2009	0.161
External Cites per document	2010	0.215
External Cites per document	2011	0.262
External Cites per document	2012	0.324
External Cites per document	2013	0.184
External Cites per document	2014	0.248
External Cites per document	2015	0.130
External Cites per document	2016	0.358
Cites per document	2003	0.231
Cites per document	2004	0.121
Cites per document	2005	0.319
Cites per document	2006	0.300
Cites per document	2007	0.444
Cites per document	2008	0.093
Cites per document	2009	0.323
Cites per document	2010	0.291
Cites per document	2011	0.369
Cites per document	2012	0.441
Cites per document	2013	0.216
Cites per document	2014	0.278
Cites per document	2015	0.179
Cites per document	2016	0.481

% International Collaboration

International Collaboration accounts for the articles that have been produced by researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's documents signed by researchers from more than one country; that is including more than one country address.

Year	International Collaboration
2003	23.81
2004	28.57
2005	31.25
2006	18.75
2007	34.78
2008	41.67
2009	25.00
2010	28.57
2011	28.57
2012	10.91
2013	19.44
2014	27.27
2015	25.00
2016	39.53

Citable documents

Non-citable documents

Not every article in a journal is considered primary research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three year windows vs. those documents other than research articles, reviews and conference papers.

Documents	Year	Value
Non-citable documents	2003	0
Non-citable documents	2004	1
Non-citable documents	2005	1
Non-citable documents	2006	1
Non-citable documents	2007	1
Non-citable documents	2008	1
Non-citable documents	2009	1
Non-citable documents	2010	0
Non-citable documents	2011	0
Non-citable documents	2012	0
Non-citable documents	2013	0
Non-citable documents	2014	0
Non-citable documents	2015	1
Non-citable documents	2016	3
Citable documents	2003	13
Citable documents	2004	33
Citable documents	2005	47
Citable documents	2006	50
Citable documents	2007	45
Citable documents	2008	54
Citable documents	2009	62
Citable documents	2010	79
Citable documents	2011	84
Citable documents	2012	102
Citable documents	2013	125
Citable documents	2014	133
Citable documents	2015	123
Citable documents	2016	106

Cited documents

Uncited documents

Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those not cited during the following year.

Documents	Year	Value
Uncited documents	2003	11
Uncited documents	2004	30
Uncited documents	2005	36
Uncited documents	2006	41
Uncited documents	2007	29
Uncited documents	2008	50
Uncited documents	2009	44
Uncited documents	2010	59
Uncited documents	2011	62
Uncited documents	2012	69
Uncited documents	2013	106
Uncited documents	2014	103
Uncited documents	2015	104
Uncited documents	2016	72
Cited documents	2003	2
Cited documents	2004	4
Cited documents	2005	12
Cited documents	2006	10
Cited documents	2007	17
Cited documents	2008	5
Cited documents	2009	19
Cited documents	2010	20
Cited documents	2011	22
Cited documents	2012	33
Cited documents	2013	19
Cited documents	2014	30
Cited documents	2015	20
Cited documents	2016	37

Show this widget in your own website

Just copy the code below and paste within your html code:

Country	Chile	11 H Index
Subject Area and Category	Agricultural and Biological Sciences Horticulture Plant Science Environmental Science Ecology
Publisher	Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanograficas, Universidad de Concepcion
Publication type	Journals
ISSN	00165301, 07176643
Coverage	1981-1982, 1984, 2002-ongoing
Scope	Gayana Botany magazine devoted to the French naturalist Claudio Gay, is a journal for publication of original research in all areas of botany. It is published by Editions of the University of Concepcion, is the organ of the Botanical Society of Chile. I see an annual volume, composed of two numbers. The magazine receives work done by researchers across nationality, prepared according to the standards of this Regulation. Accepts papers written in Spanish and English. The materials systematic taxonomy, cytological and phytochemicals should be backed by herbal materials deposited in state or institutional easy access to the scientific community. (source)