Wirtschaftsinformatik

Quartiles

The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.

Category	Year	Quartile
Information Systems	1997	Q2
Information Systems	1998	Q3
Information Systems	1999	Q3
Information Systems	2000	Q3
Information Systems	2001	Q4
Information Systems	2002	Q3
Information Systems	2003	Q4
Information Systems	2004	Q3
Information Systems	2005	Q3
Information Systems	2006	Q4
Information Systems	2007	Q3
Information Systems	2008	Q4
Information Systems	2009	Q4
Information Systems	2010	Q3
Information Systems	2011	Q4
Information Systems	2012	Q4
Information Systems	2013	Q3
Information Systems	2014	Q2
Information Systems	2015	Q2
Information Systems	2016	Q1

SJR

The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.

Year	SJR
1999	0.219
2000	0.204
2001	0.180
2002	0.232
2003	0.196
2004	0.238
2005	0.222
2006	0.161
2007	0.214
2008	0.165
2009	0.196
2010	0.205
2011	0.173
2012	0.205
2013	0.268
2014	0.463
2015	0.538
2016	0.851

Citations per document

This indicator counts the number of citations received by documents from a journal and divides them by the total number of documents published in that journal. The chart shows the evolution of the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year. The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.

Cites per document	Year	Value
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	1999	0.279
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2000	0.222
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2001	0.146
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2002	0.155
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2003	0.281
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2004	0.320
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2005	0.584
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2006	0.505
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2007	0.600
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2008	0.656
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2009	0.902
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2010	0.871
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2011	0.796
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2012	1.025
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2013	1.208
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2014	2.163
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2015	2.702
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2016	3.767
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	1999	0.279
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2000	0.221
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2001	0.175
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2002	0.181
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2003	0.331
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2004	0.365
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2005	0.606
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2006	0.580
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2007	0.602
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2008	0.638
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2009	0.979
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2010	0.931
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2011	0.868
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2012	1.074
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2013	1.496
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2014	2.496
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2015	3.238
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2016	3.889
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	1999	0.248
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2000	0.225
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2001	0.196
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2002	0.189
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2003	0.396
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2004	0.295
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2005	0.723
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2006	0.527
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2007	0.516
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2008	0.652
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2009	1.107
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2010	1.009
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2011	0.727
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2012	1.109
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2013	1.824
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2014	2.820
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2015	3.013
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2016	4.042

Total Cites

Self-Cites

Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's self-citations received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years.
Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal.

Cites	Year	Value
Self Cites	1999	30
Self Cites	2000	23
Self Cites	2001	17
Self Cites	2002	16
Self Cites	2003	27
Self Cites	2004	26
Self Cites	2005	24
Self Cites	2006	13
Self Cites	2007	12
Self Cites	2008	9
Self Cites	2009	18
Self Cites	2010	26
Self Cites	2011	29
Self Cites	2012	15
Self Cites	2013	21
Self Cites	2014	22
Self Cites	2015	27
Self Cites	2016	23
Total Cites	1999	43
Total Cites	2000	34
Total Cites	2001	28
Total Cites	2002	29
Total Cites	2003	51
Total Cites	2004	54
Total Cites	2005	83
Total Cites	2006	83
Total Cites	2007	80
Total Cites	2008	88
Total Cites	2009	142
Total Cites	2010	148
Total Cites	2011	125
Total Cites	2012	159
Total Cites	2013	175
Total Cites	2014	302
Total Cites	2015	327
Total Cites	2016	420

External Cites per Doc

Cites per Doc

Evolution of the number of total citation per document and external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. External citations are calculated by subtracting the number of self-citations from the total number of citations received by the journal’s documents.

Cites	Year	Value
External Cites per document	1999	0.084
External Cites per document	2000	0.071
External Cites per document	2001	0.069
External Cites per document	2002	0.081
External Cites per document	2003	0.156
External Cites per document	2004	0.189
External Cites per document	2005	0.431
External Cites per document	2006	0.490
External Cites per document	2007	0.511
External Cites per document	2008	0.572
External Cites per document	2009	0.855
External Cites per document	2010	0.767
External Cites per document	2011	0.667
External Cites per document	2012	0.973
External Cites per document	2013	1.316
External Cites per document	2014	2.314
External Cites per document	2015	2.970
External Cites per document	2016	3.676
Cites per document	1999	0.279
Cites per document	2000	0.221
Cites per document	2001	0.175
Cites per document	2002	0.181
Cites per document	2003	0.331
Cites per document	2004	0.365
Cites per document	2005	0.606
Cites per document	2006	0.580
Cites per document	2007	0.602
Cites per document	2008	0.638
Cites per document	2009	0.979
Cites per document	2010	0.931
Cites per document	2011	0.868
Cites per document	2012	1.074
Cites per document	2013	1.496
Cites per document	2014	2.496
Cites per document	2015	3.238
Cites per document	2016	3.889

% International Collaboration

International Collaboration accounts for the articles that have been produced by researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's documents signed by researchers from more than one country; that is including more than one country address.

Year	International Collaboration
1999	4.08
2000	1.72
2001	1.89
2002	6.98
2003	3.70
2004	2.13
2005	7.69
2006	1.96
2007	1.69
2008	11.43
2009	8.57
2010	13.95
2011	30.49
2012	16.95
2013	18.06
2014	43.75
2015	41.67
2016	50.00

Citable documents

Non-citable documents

Not every article in a journal is considered primary research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three year windows vs. those documents other than research articles, reviews and conference papers.

Documents	Year	Value
Non-citable documents	1999	0
Non-citable documents	2000	0
Non-citable documents	2001	0
Non-citable documents	2002	0
Non-citable documents	2003	0
Non-citable documents	2004	2
Non-citable documents	2005	7
Non-citable documents	2006	10
Non-citable documents	2007	17
Non-citable documents	2008	24
Non-citable documents	2009	35
Non-citable documents	2010	40
Non-citable documents	2011	39
Non-citable documents	2012	47
Non-citable documents	2013	67
Non-citable documents	2014	92
Non-citable documents	2015	94
Non-citable documents	2016	76
Citable documents	1999	154
Citable documents	2000	154
Citable documents	2001	160
Citable documents	2002	160
Citable documents	2003	154
Citable documents	2004	148
Citable documents	2005	137
Citable documents	2006	143
Citable documents	2007	133
Citable documents	2008	138
Citable documents	2009	145
Citable documents	2010	159
Citable documents	2011	144
Citable documents	2012	148
Citable documents	2013	117
Citable documents	2014	121
Citable documents	2015	101
Citable documents	2016	108

Cited documents

Uncited documents

Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those not cited during the following year.

Documents	Year	Value
Uncited documents	1999	121
Uncited documents	2000	130
Uncited documents	2001	135
Uncited documents	2002	135
Uncited documents	2003	118
Uncited documents	2004	113
Uncited documents	2005	95
Uncited documents	2006	110
Uncited documents	2007	102
Uncited documents	2008	118
Uncited documents	2009	126
Uncited documents	2010	124
Uncited documents	2011	128
Uncited documents	2012	123
Uncited documents	2013	111
Uncited documents	2014	114
Uncited documents	2015	101
Uncited documents	2016	89
Cited documents	1999	33
Cited documents	2000	24
Cited documents	2001	25
Cited documents	2002	25
Cited documents	2003	36
Cited documents	2004	37
Cited documents	2005	49
Cited documents	2006	43
Cited documents	2007	48
Cited documents	2008	44
Cited documents	2009	54
Cited documents	2010	75
Cited documents	2011	55
Cited documents	2012	72
Cited documents	2013	73
Cited documents	2014	99
Cited documents	2015	94
Cited documents	2016	95

Show this widget in your own website

Just copy the code below and paste within your html code:

Country	Germany	28 H Index
Subject Area and Category	Computer Science Information Systems
Publisher	Gabler Verlag
Publication type	Journals
ISSN	18670202, 09376429
Coverage	1991, 1996-ongoing
Scope	In ihrem Editorial geben Witold Abramowicz, Dieter Fensel und Ulrich Frank einen Überblick über das vorliegende Schwerpunktheft, das sich der Frage widmet, wie Web 2.0 und Sematic Web ein leistungsfähiges Geschäftsprozessmanagement geeignet unterstützen können. Im ersten Aufsatz „Steigerung der Softwareflexibilität bei Geschäftsprozessänderungen“ stellen Oliver Holschke, Jannis Rake, Philipp Offermann und Udo Bub eine simulationsbasierte Methode vor, die eine komfortable und sichere Anpassung von Geschäftsprozessen unter Verwendung von SOA erlaubt. (source)