Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review

Quartiles

The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.

Category	Year	Quartile
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine	1997	Q2
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine	1998	Q3
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine	1999	Q3
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine	2000	Q3
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine	2001	Q3
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine	2002	Q2
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine	2003	Q3
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine	2004	Q3
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine	2005	Q3
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine	2006	Q3
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine	2007	Q3
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine	2008	Q2
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine	2009	Q1
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine	2010	Q1
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine	2011	Q1
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine	2012	Q1
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine	2013	Q1
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine	2014	Q1
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine	2015	Q2
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine	2016	Q2
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	1997	Q2
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	1998	Q3
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	1999	Q3
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2000	Q2
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2001	Q3
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2002	Q2
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2003	Q2
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2004	Q3
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2005	Q2
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2006	Q2
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2007	Q3
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2008	Q2
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2009	Q1
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2010	Q1
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2011	Q1
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2012	Q1
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2013	Q1
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2014	Q1
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2015	Q1
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation	2016	Q2
Sports Science	1997	Q3
Sports Science	1998	Q4
Sports Science	1999	Q3
Sports Science	2000	Q3
Sports Science	2001	Q4
Sports Science	2002	Q3
Sports Science	2003	Q3
Sports Science	2004	Q4
Sports Science	2005	Q3
Sports Science	2006	Q3
Sports Science	2007	Q4
Sports Science	2008	Q3
Sports Science	2009	Q2
Sports Science	2010	Q1
Sports Science	2011	Q1
Sports Science	2012	Q1
Sports Science	2013	Q2
Sports Science	2014	Q2
Sports Science	2015	Q2
Sports Science	2016	Q2

SJR

The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.

Year	SJR
1999	0.213
2000	0.340
2001	0.191
2002	0.427
2003	0.245
2004	0.161
2005	0.248
2006	0.242
2007	0.153
2008	0.535
2009	0.956
2010	1.396
2011	1.141
2012	1.210
2013	1.114
2014	0.989
2015	0.795
2016	0.736

Citations per document

This indicator counts the number of citations received by documents from a journal and divides them by the total number of documents published in that journal. The chart shows the evolution of the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year. The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.

Cites per document	Year	Value
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	1999	0.257
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2000	0.310
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2001	0.318
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2002	0.441
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2003	0.352
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2004	0.403
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2005	0.351
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2006	0.411
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2007	0.277
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2008	0.864
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2009	1.559
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2010	2.896
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2011	2.550
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2012	3.459
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2013	2.553
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2014	2.739
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2015	2.354
Cites / Doc. (4 years)	2016	1.752
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	1999	0.257
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2000	0.364
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2001	0.204
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2002	0.523
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2003	0.330
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2004	0.276
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2005	0.281
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2006	0.344
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2007	0.250
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2008	1.071
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2009	1.961
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2010	2.881
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2011	2.491
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2012	3.458
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2013	2.425
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2014	2.467
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2015	2.018
Cites / Doc. (3 years)	2016	1.664
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	1999	0.351
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2000	0.269
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2001	0.216
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2002	0.329
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2003	0.368
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2004	0.317
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2005	0.286
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2006	0.318
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2007	0.328
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2008	1.424
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2009	1.609
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2010	2.464
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2011	2.296
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2012	3.273
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2013	1.977
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2014	1.973
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2015	1.700
Cites / Doc. (2 years)	2016	1.513

Total Cites

Self-Cites

Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's self-citations received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years.
Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal.

Cites	Year	Value
Self Cites	1999	0
Self Cites	2000	5
Self Cites	2001	1
Self Cites	2002	0
Self Cites	2003	2
Self Cites	2004	0
Self Cites	2005	0
Self Cites	2006	2
Self Cites	2007	2
Self Cites	2008	4
Self Cites	2009	1
Self Cites	2010	7
Self Cites	2011	18
Self Cites	2012	3
Self Cites	2013	1
Self Cites	2014	6
Self Cites	2015	2
Self Cites	2016	3
Total Cites	1999	28
Total Cites	2000	39
Total Cites	2001	22
Total Cites	2002	57
Total Cites	2003	36
Total Cites	2004	27
Total Cites	2005	27
Total Cites	2006	33
Total Cites	2007	25
Total Cites	2008	106
Total Cites	2009	202
Total Cites	2010	291
Total Cites	2011	269
Total Cites	2012	415
Total Cites	2013	308
Total Cites	2014	301
Total Cites	2015	220
Total Cites	2016	183

External Cites per Doc

Cites per Doc

Evolution of the number of total citation per document and external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. External citations are calculated by subtracting the number of self-citations from the total number of citations received by the journal’s documents.

Cites	Year	Value
External Cites per document	1999	0.257
External Cites per document	2000	0.318
External Cites per document	2001	0.194
External Cites per document	2002	0.523
External Cites per document	2003	0.312
External Cites per document	2004	0.276
External Cites per document	2005	0.281
External Cites per document	2006	0.323
External Cites per document	2007	0.230
External Cites per document	2008	1.030
External Cites per document	2009	1.951
External Cites per document	2010	2.812
External Cites per document	2011	2.324
External Cites per document	2012	3.433
External Cites per document	2013	2.417
External Cites per document	2014	2.418
External Cites per document	2015	2.000
External Cites per document	2016	1.636
Cites per document	1999	0.257
Cites per document	2000	0.364
Cites per document	2001	0.204
Cites per document	2002	0.523
Cites per document	2003	0.330
Cites per document	2004	0.276
Cites per document	2005	0.281
Cites per document	2006	0.344
Cites per document	2007	0.250
Cites per document	2008	1.071
Cites per document	2009	1.961
Cites per document	2010	2.881
Cites per document	2011	2.491
Cites per document	2012	3.458
Cites per document	2013	2.425
Cites per document	2014	2.467
Cites per document	2015	2.018
Cites per document	2016	1.664

% International Collaboration

International Collaboration accounts for the articles that have been produced by researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's documents signed by researchers from more than one country; that is including more than one country address.

Year	International Collaboration
1999	0.00
2000	9.76
2001	0.00
2002	0.00
2003	3.03
2004	0.00
2005	10.26
2006	0.00
2007	13.51
2008	4.88
2009	5.26
2010	6.82
2011	38.46
2012	4.65
2013	12.82
2014	7.14
2015	6.52
2016	21.95

Citable documents

Non-citable documents

Not every article in a journal is considered primary research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three year windows vs. those documents other than research articles, reviews and conference papers.

Documents	Year	Value
Non-citable documents	1999	0
Non-citable documents	2000	0
Non-citable documents	2001	0
Non-citable documents	2002	3
Non-citable documents	2003	7
Non-citable documents	2004	10
Non-citable documents	2005	11
Non-citable documents	2006	13
Non-citable documents	2007	14
Non-citable documents	2008	15
Non-citable documents	2009	13
Non-citable documents	2010	15
Non-citable documents	2011	15
Non-citable documents	2012	14
Non-citable documents	2013	12
Non-citable documents	2014	12
Non-citable documents	2015	15
Non-citable documents	2016	17
Citable documents	1999	109
Citable documents	2000	107
Citable documents	2001	108
Citable documents	2002	109
Citable documents	2003	109
Citable documents	2004	98
Citable documents	2005	96
Citable documents	2006	96
Citable documents	2007	100
Citable documents	2008	99
Citable documents	2009	103
Citable documents	2010	101
Citable documents	2011	108
Citable documents	2012	120
Citable documents	2013	127
Citable documents	2014	122
Citable documents	2015	109
Citable documents	2016	110

Cited documents

Uncited documents

Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those not cited during the following year.

Documents	Year	Value
Uncited documents	1999	91
Uncited documents	2000	83
Uncited documents	2001	95
Uncited documents	2002	85
Uncited documents	2003	89
Uncited documents	2004	84
Uncited documents	2005	88
Uncited documents	2006	82
Uncited documents	2007	96
Uncited documents	2008	55
Uncited documents	2009	43
Uncited documents	2010	37
Uncited documents	2011	44
Uncited documents	2012	31
Uncited documents	2013	40
Uncited documents	2014	37
Uncited documents	2015	50
Uncited documents	2016	53
Cited documents	1999	18
Cited documents	2000	24
Cited documents	2001	13
Cited documents	2002	27
Cited documents	2003	27
Cited documents	2004	24
Cited documents	2005	19
Cited documents	2006	27
Cited documents	2007	18
Cited documents	2008	59
Cited documents	2009	73
Cited documents	2010	79
Cited documents	2011	79
Cited documents	2012	103
Cited documents	2013	99
Cited documents	2014	97
Cited documents	2015	74
Cited documents	2016	74

Show this widget in your own website

Just copy the code below and paste within your html code:

Country	United States	37 H Index
Subject Area and Category	Health Professions Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation Sports Science Medicine Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Publisher	Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ltd.
Publication type	Journals
ISSN	10628592
Coverage	1996-ongoing
Scope	Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review helps physicians digest the large volume of clinical literature in sports medicine and arthroscopy, identify the most important new developments, and apply new information effectively in clinical practice. Each issue is guest-edited by an acknowledged expert and focuses on a single topic or controversy. The Guest Editor invites the leading specialists on the topic to write review articles that highlight the most important advances. This unique format makes the journal more in-depth, authoritative, and practical than most publications in this field. The journal also includes dozens of full-color and black-and-white arthroscopic images and illustrations. (source)